Illuminating Individual-Level Sources of Crime for African Americans and Whites: An Examination of Four Theories

crime;race

Latimore, Traronda ; William R. Smith, Committee Member,Ronald Czaja, Committee Member,Charles R. Tittle, Committee Chair,Donald Tomaskovic-Devey, Committee Member,Catherine Zimmer, Committee Member,Melvin Thomas, Committee Member,Latimore, Traronda ; William R. Smith ; Committee Member ; Ronald Czaja ; Committee Member ; Charles R. Tittle ; Committee Chair ; Donald Tomaskovic-Devey ; Committee Member ; Catherine Zimmer ; Committee Member ; Melvin Thomas ; Committee Member

University:North Carolina State University

关键词: crime;    race;   

Others  :  https://repository.lib.ncsu.edu/bitstream/handle/1840.16/4244/etd.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

美国|英语

来源: null

【 摘 要 】

This research addresses two important theoretical questions in the sociological study of race and crime: (1) If racial differences exist between African Americans and Whites, can self-control, general strain, social bonding, and social learning theories account for the differences? (i.e., the "racial gap" issue) and (2) Are the processes specified by these theories the same for African Americans and Whites? (i.e., the "racial generality" issue).Using data from randomly selected African American and White adults who live in Wake County, North Carolina, several answers to these questions are suggested.Concerning the "racial gap" issue, this study finds no significant differences in offending between African Americans and Whites.Concerning the "racial generality" issue, the results offer considerable insight into the individual-level sources of crime for both groups.Collectively, the findings offer limited support for social bonding theory and mixed support for self-control, general strain, and social learning theories.The implications of these results, particularly as they pertain to criminological theory and social policy, are also discussed.