Disciplining P-12 public school personnel for off-duty conduct : an analysis of the judicial response.

P-12;School law;Disciplining;Public school;Off-duty conduct;Judicial

Ruth Louise Davison, 1965-

University:University of Louisville

Department:Department of Leadership, Foundations, and Human Resource Education

关键词: P-12;    School law;    Disciplining;    Public school;    Off-duty conduct;    Judicial;   

Others  :  https://ir.library.louisville.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1321&context=etd

美国|英语

来源: The Universite of Louisville's Institutional Repository

【 摘 要 】

The right to discipline a P-12 public school employee for off-duty conduct remains unclear. Historically, society has held teachers up to a higher standard of conduct than persons in most other professions. The researcher traced the teacher-as-role-model theory back to antiquity. The literature further indicated that courts often rely on the role model theory when deciding judicial challenges based on adverse employment decisions. Courts also refer to the nexus theory, demanding that a relationship exist between off-duty conduct and the job. The following research question guided this study: When is it legal for P-12 public school employers to discipline employees for off-duty conduct? The researcher examined a broad spectrum of off-duty conduct and incorporated every case in the national reporting system related to off-duty conduct. By using legal methodology, the researcher identified 161 cases related to the research question. Critical examination of each case provided a full understanding of the judicial response to employee challenges based on discipline for off-duty conduct. Furthermore, the researcher created a data analysis form used to capture identical information from each case to assess relationships among the cases. While the study did not use any form of statistical analysis, the researcher gathered quantifiable data for describing the cases collectively. Employers prevailed in the 57% of the identified cases. While courts granted wide latitude to employers to discipline employees for off-duty conduct, employees enjoyed some constitutional protections under the right to privacy, association, speech, religion, reputation, due process and equal protection. Employees faced discipline twice as many times for off-duty conduct involving criminal activity, as compared to non-criminal activity. Courts referred to the teacher-as-role-model and nexus theories in 90% of the cases.