Style and experience as a dichotomy in criticism of the novels of Jean Rhys, Doris Lessing and J G Ballard

P Language and Literature > PN Literature (General)

Moore, Michael ; Gunning, David

University:University of Birmingham

Department:School of English, Drama and American & Canadian Studies, Department of English Literature

关键词: P Language and Literature;    PN Literature (General);   

Others  :  http://etheses.bham.ac.uk//id/eprint/5122/1/Moore14MPhil.pdf

来源: University of Birmingham eTheses Repository

【 摘 要 】

This thesis is a survey of the critical responses to the work of Jean Rhys, Doris Lessing and J G Ballard, combined with close readings of three of their novels, these being Rhys’s Good Morning, Midnight, Lessing’s The Golden Notebook, and Ballard’s The Atrocity Exhibition. My primary contention is that the criticism of the work of these three authors is distinguished by a dichotomy between critics focusing on elements described as ‘experiential’, the novels as subjective evocations of real-world phenomena, and those focusing on elements described as ‘stylistic’, the novels as technical exercises. Drawing on the work of Shosana Felman, this dichotomy is seen to result from a careful balance maintained in the fiction itself between stylistic and experiential elements. Though the entire body of criticism mirrors the nature of the fiction it analyses, in attempting to interpret these novels individual critics upset the balance these works strive for between experience and style. In contrast this thesis aims for a reading of Rhys, Lessing and Ballard’s work which retains this balance. In particular the three novels mentioned above are read as ambiguous works of literature which largely frustrate definitive interpretation.