Although speech is error-prone, verbal communication is successful because speakers can detect (and correct) their errors. The standard theory of speech-error detection,the perceptual-loop account, posits that the comprehension system monitors productionoutput for errors. Such a comprehension-based monitor, however, cannot explain thedouble dissociation between comprehension and error-detection ability observed in theaphasic patients. We propose a new theory of speech-error detection which is, instead, basedon the production process itself. The theory borrows from studies of forced-choiceresponsetasks the notion that error detection is accomplished by monitoring responseconflict via a frontal brain structure, such as the anterior cingulate cortex. We implement thisidea in the two-step model of word production, and test the model-derived predictions on asample of aphasic patients. Our results show a strong correlation between patients’ error detectionability and the model’s characterization of their production skills, and nosignificant correlation between error detection and comprehension measures, thussupporting a production-based monitor, generally, and the implemented conflict-basedmonitor in particular. The successful application of the conflict-based theory to error detectionin linguistic, as well as non-linguistic domains points to a domain-generalmonitoring system.
【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files
Size
Format
View
Is comprehension necessary for error detection? A conflict-based account of monitoring in speech production