Objectives: To explore whether a semi–structured post-traumatic amnesia (PTA) assessment interview (PTA-I) provides a practicable but equivalent estimation of PTA in patients attending the Emergency Department (ED) with head injury (HI) compared to the established Westmead PTA Scale Revised (R-WPTAS). Procedure: PTA was assessed using the R-WPTAS (includes a visual memory component) and the PTA-I (includes retrospective and verbal memory components), in patients attending an ED with (n=30) or without (n= 30) HI.Outcome measures were the Post-concussion Syndrome Checklist (PCSC) and the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS). McNemar’s Tests and Chi-square analyses were used to determine the results. Results: The verbal memory component overestimated PTA in the control group by 24 %. Overall, the PTA-I did not discriminate between HI and control participants. However the retrospective PTA assessment embedded within the PTA-I did, with 100 % accuracy. Conclusions: The use of a verbal memory component to assess PTA in the ED is not supported by the results of this study.A retrospective PTA assessment appears to allow more accurate decision making regarding the admission criteria used in the ED and has advantages over the R-WPTAS: fewer test materials and no repeat assessments required to achieve an estimate of PTA duration.
【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files
Size
Format
View
Estimation of post-traumatic amnesia in emergency department attendees presenting with head injury