Biomechanics and Energetics of Bipedal Locomotion on Uneven Terrain.

locomotion;uneven terrain;energetics;biomechanics;Mechanical Engineering;Kinesiology and Sports;Engineering;Health Sciences;Kinesiology and Mechanical Engineering

Voloshina, Alexandra S.Daley, Monica Ann ;

University of Michigan

关键词: locomotion;    uneven terrain;    energetics;    biomechanics;    Mechanical Engineering;    Kinesiology and Sports;    Engineering;    Health Sciences;    Kinesiology and Mechanical Engineering;   

Others  :  https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/111616/voloshis_1.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

瑞士|英语

来源: The Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship

【 摘 要 】

Humans navigate uneven terrain in their everyday lives. From trails, grass, and uneven sidewalks, we constantly adapt to various surfaces in our environment. Past research has shown that walking on natural terrain, compared to walking on smooth flat surfaces, results in increased energy expenditure during locomotion. However, the biomechanical adaptations responsible for this energetic increase are unclear, since locomotion research is often conducted either on short walkways or in an outdoor setting, thus limiting data collections. To further our understanding of human locomotion on uneven terrain, I focused on quantifying the biomechanical and energetic changes due to increased terrain variability during walking and running. First, this thesis presents modifications to a regular exercise treadmill to allow for attachment of a separate uneven surface. Using this treadmill, I collected kinetic, kinematic, electromyographic, and energy expenditure data during continuous human walking and running. I showed that humans walking at 1.0m/s on an uneven surface, with a 2.5cm height variability, increased energy expenditure by 0.73W/kg (approx. 28%) compared to walking on smooth terrain. Greater energy expenditure was primarily caused by increased positive work at the hip and knee, with minor contributions from increased muscle activity and step parameter adaptations. I then showed that running at 2.3m/s on the same surface resulted in an energetic increase of 0.48W/kg (approx. 5%) compared to running on even terrain. In contrast to walking, humans compensated for uneven terrain during running by reducing positive work produced by the ankle and adapting a more crouched leg posture. The similar absolute increases in energetic cost between walking and running implied that much of this increase is likely due to surface height variability and changes in mechanical work. Finally, this work presents analytical and simulated analyses for the rimless wheel and simplest walker models. These analyses explored the relationship between gait dynamics, energy input strategies, surface unevenness and the energetic cost of walking. Together, these studies advance our understanding of the relationship between mechanics and energetics of human walking on uneven surfaces and could potentially lead to more robust and energetically efficient legged robots, prostheses and more effective clinical rehabilitation interventions.