Authority, Expertise, and Impression Management: GenderedProfessionalization of Chemists in the Academy.

Gender;STEM;Higher Education;Expertise;Social Psychology;Education;Sociology;Women"s and Gender Studies;Social Sciences;Sociology

Hirshfield, Laura EllenStewart, Abigail J. ;

University of Michigan

关键词: Gender;    STEM;    Higher Education;    Expertise;    Social Psychology;    Education;    Sociology;    Women";    s and Gender Studies;    Social Sciences;    Sociology;   

Others  :  https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/89796/lhirshf_1.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

瑞士|英语

来源: The Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship

【 摘 要 】

Women face more barriers to their success than their men counterparts in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) disciplines.While much of the research on women’s experience in science has focused on their entry into or exit out of STEM fields (the ;;leaky pipeline”), less is known about the obstacles that women scientists face at work, due to the dearth of ethnographic work exploring gender and day-to-day experiences in the academic workplace.Using data from a qualitative study of graduate students and postdoctoral fellows in chemistry involving over 120 hours of ethnographic observation and 40 semi-structured interviews, I focus specifically on the gendered nature of authority, expertise, and impression management to investigate several of the obstacles women scientists face at work.In the first chapter, I investigate men and women graduate students’ and postdocs’ expectations of expertise.I argue that overall, men are more likely than their women peers to be seen as experts in chemistry.As a result, men graduate students benefit from more practice with skills that are applicable to their future careers: applying scientific knowledge to relevant questions and communicating this information to others. In the second chapter, I focus on gender and graduate student socialization.I find that the link between men, science, and academia creates a context in which men do not need to work as hard to establish their claim to scientific authority.Therefore, men are able to perform masculinity in varied and complex ways, while women, who do not embody masculinity, feel more pressure to conform to strict norms of competition that are associated with traditional masculinity. In the last chapter, I discuss the impression management strategies that men and women chemists-in-training use to navigate authority and expertise.I find that men are more likely than women to employ interactional styles that feature their expertise when in group situations, while women are more likely to minimize theirs.In contrast, while teaching, women sometimes use styles that align with masculinity rather than with femininity.Finally, men’s bodies occasionally eliminate men’s need for impression management in the classroom because being masculine grants them authority.