Rome Without Emperors:The Revival of a Senatorial City in the Fourth Century CE.

Rome-history;Rome-senators;Rome-emperors;Bishop of Rome;Symmachus;Quintus Aurelius;Late Antiquity;Classical Studies;Humanities;Greek & Roman History

Chenault, Robert R.Squatriti, Paolo ;

University of Michigan

关键词: Rome-history;    Rome-senators;    Rome-emperors;    Bishop of Rome;    Symmachus;    Quintus Aurelius;    Late Antiquity;    Classical Studies;    Humanities;    Greek & Roman History;   

Others  :  https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/60773/rchenaul_1.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

瑞士|英语

来源: The Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship

【 摘 要 】

This dissertation is a study in the cultural history of Rome in the years 312-410.Scholarship on this period has tended to focus on Christianization—both of Rome’s population, especially its senators, and of its topography, as manifested in the building of churches.In contrast, I argue that most aristocrats were less concerned with their religious identity as pagans or Christians than with maintaining and displaying their elite status.Christianity was not the only novelty of the fourth century, for this period coincided with the emperors’ abandonment of Rome as a regular residence:in this span of nearly a century, there was an emperor present in Rome for only a handful of occasions totaling about two years.The absence of the emperors created both opportunities and challenges for Rome’s senators.On the one hand, it allowed them to emerge from the emperor’s shadow and recover a measure of their former visibility in the city; to this degree, Rome in some ways became more ;;senatorial” than it had been at any time since the late Republic.At the same time, however, the absence of the emperors called into question Rome’s identity as the capital of the empire.Senators could not avoid the awkward fact that real power was located far away, in the formerly inconsequential provincial cities which emperors now used as their regular residences.Thus the most difficult question confronting Rome’s senators was this new political geography of empire.Senators now had to compete for appointments and influence with new elites in the provinces and at court.They were forced to articulate why Rome was still a special place in an age when imperial patronage was making new cities into rivals and even potential replacements of Rome.From this perspective, the challenge facing senators at Rome was less their religious identity than adjusting to the marginality of Rome in the late Empire.