科技报告详细信息
Modal Testing of a Flexible Wing on a Dynamically Active Test Fixture Using Fixed Base Correction Method - IFASD 2019
Spivey, Natalie ; Miller, Kia ; Saltzman, Rachel ; Napolitano, Kevin
关键词: FLEXIBLE WINGS;    BOUNDARY CONDITIONS;    MODAL RESPONSE;    FREQUENCY RESPONSE;    FINITE ELEMENT METHOD;    CORRECTION;    GROUND TESTS;    STRUCTURAL STABILITY;    DYNAMIC STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS;    AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES;   
RP-ID  :  AFRC-E-DAA-TN66924
美国|英语
来源: NASA Technical Reports Server
PDF
【 摘 要 】

In modal testing and finite element model correlation, analysts desire modal results using free-free or rigid boundary conditions to ease comparisons of test versus analytical data. It is often expensive both in cost and schedule to build and test with boundary conditions that replicate the free-free or rigid boundaries. Static test fixtures for load testing are often large, heavy, and unyielding, but do not provide adequate boundaries for modal tests because they are dynamically too flexible and often contain natural frequencies within the test article frequency range of interest. The dynamic coupling between the test article and test fixture complicates the model updating process because significant effort needs to be spent on modeling the test fixture and boundary conditions in addition to the test article. If the modal results could be corrected for fixture coupling, then setups used for other structural testing could be adequate for modal testing and would allow significant schedule and cost savings by eliminating a unique setup for only modal testing. To simplify future modal tests, this paper reports on a fixed base correction method that was investigated during modal testing of a full-scale, half-span, flexible wing cantilevered from a static test fixture. The results of this fixed base correction approach look very promising. The method aided in producing similar wing modal characteristics for two different physical boundary configurations of a dynamically active test fixture.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20190026505.pdf 2486KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:16次 浏览次数:8次