科技报告详细信息
Comprehensive Assessment of Models and Events Using Library Tools (CAMEL) Framework: Time Series Comparisons
Rastätter, Lutz ; Wiegand, Chiu P ; Mullinix, Richard E ; MacNeice, Peter J
关键词: BIAS;    COMPUTER PROGRAMS;    COMPUTERIZED SIMULATION;    DATA PROCESSING;    INTERPOLATION;    METADATA;    POSITION (LOCATION);    ROOT-MEAN-SQUARE ERRORS;    SCIENTIFIC VISUALIZATION;    SPACE WEATHER;    TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT;    TIME SERIES ANALYSIS;   
RP-ID  :  GSFC-E-DAA-TN73754
学科分类:软件
美国|英语
来源: NASA Technical Reports Server
PDF
【 摘 要 】

The Comprehensive Assessment of Models and Events using Library Tools (CAMEL) framework leverages existing Community Coordinated Modeling Center services: Run on Request post processing tools that generate model time series outputs and the new Community Coordinated Modeling Center Metadata Registry that describes simulation runs using Space Physics Archive Search and Extract metadata. The new CAMEL visualization tool compares the modeled time series with observational data and computes a suite of skill scores such as Prediction Efficiency, Root Mean Square Error, and Symmetric Signed Percentage Bias. Model data pairs used for skill calculations are obtained considering a user selected maximum difference between the time of observation and the nearest model output. The system renders available data for all locations and time periods selected using interactive visualizations that allow the user to zoom, pan, and pick data values along traces. Skill scores are reported for each selected event or aggregated over all events for all participating model runs. Separately, scores are reported for all locations (satellites or stations) and for each location individually. We are building on past experiences with model data comparisons of magnetosphere and ionosphere model outputs from GEM2008, GEMCEDAR Electrodynamics Thermosphere Ionosphere, and the SWPC Operational Space Weather Model challenges. The CAMEL visualization tool is demonstrated using three validation studies: (a) Wang Sheeley Arge heliosphere simulations compared against OMNI solar wind data, (b) ground magnetic perturbations from several magnetosphere and ionosphere electrodynamics models as observed by magnetometers, and (c) electron fluxes from several ring current simulations compared to Radiation Belt Storm Probes Helium Oxygen Proton Electron instrument measurements, integrated over different energy ranges.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20190032553.pdf 2832KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:10次 浏览次数:15次