科技报告详细信息
Correlation of Full-Scale Isolated Proprotor Performance and Loads
Kottapalli, Sesi ; Acree, C W, Jr
关键词: AERODYNAMICS;    AIRSPEED;    BELL AIRCRAFT;    CLIMBING FLIGHT;    HELICOPTERS;    HOVERING;    LOADS (FORCES);    LOW SPEED;    ROTORS;    TEST CHAMBERS;    TILT ROTOR AIRCRAFT;    TORSION;    VERTICAL TAKEOFF AIRCRAFT;    WIND TUNNEL TESTS;   
RP-ID  :  ARC-E-DAA-TN67347
学科分类:航空航天科学
美国|英语
来源: NASA Technical Reports Server
PDF
【 摘 要 】

A full-scale isolated proprotor test was recently conducted in the USAF National Full-Scale Aerodynamics Complex (NFAC) at NASA Ames Research Center. The test article was a 3-bladed research rotor derived from the right-hand rotor of the AW609. For this test, the NASA Tiltrotor Test Rig (TTR) and rotor were installed in the 40- by 80-foot test section. This paper presents correlations between data and predictions of rotor performance and blade moments using the newly acquired test data and the comprehensive analysis CAMRAD II. The operational conditions covered in this analytical study are: hover (actually, low speed vertical climb), cruise (airplane mode), conversion, and helicopter mode. Mean and 1/2 peak-to-peak quantities (hpp) are correlated; time-history correlation for the helicopter condition is also included. The correlation is reasonable to good. Also, the hover calculations turned out to be useful in providing reality checks on the test hardware such as: a) the functioning of the blade strain gages and b) calibration of the measurement of the collective pitch hardware. The time-history correlation shows that, compared to the rolled-up wake model, the multiple-trailer wake model improves the correlation slightly; the longitudinal cyclic correlation is reasonable but the lateral cyclic correlation is not good, and the collective is predicted well by the rolled-up wake model; the flap moment correlation is reasonable; the pitch link load and lag moment are underpredicted; and the torsion moment correlation is poor and needs further study.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20190025114.pdf 10706KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:19次 浏览次数:29次