科技报告详细信息
Comparisons of Two Spatial Implementations of a Crop Model Using Remotely Sensed Observations over Southeastern United States
Mishra, Vikalp ; Ellenburg, Walter Lee ; Markert, Kel ; Pulla, Sarva T
关键词: CORN;    FARM CROPS;    REMOTE SENSING;    DATA ACQUISITION;    ENVIRONMENT MODELS;    COMPUTERIZED SIMULATION;    ACCURACY;   
RP-ID  :  MSFC-E-DAA-TN63602
学科分类:地球科学(综合)
美国|英语
来源: NASA Technical Reports Server
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Global food security is one of the most pressing issues of the current century, particularly for developing nations. Agricultural simulation models can be a key component in testing new technologies, seeds and cultivars etc. However, inaccurate input information, model related errors and the mode of implementation can also add to model uncertainties. In this study, the crop model is implemented in two separate fashions: a)gridded (GriDSSAT model) and b) using random spatial ensembles (RHEAS model). This is done in the Southeastern US to evaluate and understand the modelperformance over a region data availabilities. Once the model performance is assessed, multiple satellite based earth observation parameters such as soil moisture, vegetation index etc. can be assimilated into crop models to reduce input and model related uncertainties particularly in data limited regions. In this study, the National Agricultural Statistical Services (NASS) reported yield data at county levels are used for comparison andvalidation purposes. The GriDSSAT model estimation of corn yields in comparison with the reported NASS yields showed an overall RMSD of nearly 3720 (kg/ha) whereas RMSD for the RHEAS model implementation was 3550 (kg/ha). Overall the GriDSSAT model had negative bias of nearly 2400 kg/ha (except for 2013) while RHEAS had a slight positive bias of 400 kg/ha (approx.).

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20180008627.pdf 1995KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:9次 浏览次数:13次