科技报告详细信息
Optimization of a Multifunctional Hot Structure Aeroshell for Mars Entry
Langston, Sarah L ; Lang, Christopher G ; Daryabeigi, Kamran
关键词: AEROSHELLS;    AEROSPACE VEHICLES;    ATMOSPHERIC ENTRY;    COST EFFECTIVENESS;    SPACECRAFT STRUCTURES;    STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS;    THERMAL PROTECTION;    ABLATIVE MATERIALS;    AERODYNAMIC DRAG;    HIGH TEMPERATURE;    LOADS (FORCES);    MARS SURFACE;    NASTRAN;    WEIGHT REDUCTION;   
RP-ID  :  NASA/TM-2018-219819,L-20917,NF1676L-29731
学科分类:航空航天科学
美国|英语
来源: NASA Technical Reports Server
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Vehicle size and weight are driving cost factors in sending vehicles into space because the cost of launch is directly related to the payload mass being delivered. Vehicle size and weight have a larger impact on deep- space missions compared to sending a payload to low Earth orbit due to the extra fuel and supplies required to complete the longer duration mission. One area of study for possible vehicle volume or weight reduction is the thermal protection system (TPS) of a vehicle. Hot structures have been proposed as a TPS concept which can carry both primary structural loads and thermal loads. The use of hot structures on a Mars entry vehicle may be feasible and have potential volume and weight savings over the current state of the art ablative TPS technology. A preliminary trade study was performed on a mid lift-to-drag aeroshell Mars entry concept vehicle; comparing the weight and skin thickness of a vehicle using ablative TPS with a vehicle using hot structures. Independent thermal and structural analyses were performed to determine the minimum mass designs. The goal of this study was to determine if the use of hot structures was feasible and had potential for significant vehicle volume and weight savings over the current state of the art. This trade study found that use of a hot structures leads to a feasible alternative to ablative TPS technology, with potential 53% weight and 22% thickness (volume) saving benefits that could enable future missions.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20180003201.pdf 871KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:9次 浏览次数:6次