Review of LLNS Contractor Assurance System (CAS)

Johnston, J E ; Litus, M ; Metta, S ; Luce, W

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

关键词: Management;    99 General And Miscellaneous//Mathematics, Computing, And Information Science;    Recommendations;    Implementation;    Functionals;   

DOI  :  10.2172/926001
RP-ID  :  LLNL-TR-400830
RP-ID  :  W-7405-ENG-48
RP-ID  :  926001

美国|英语

来源: UNT Digital Library

【 摘 要 】

The focus of the review was to evaluate the LLNS Contractor Assurance System (CAS) system description document and implementation plan. The team reviewed the description document and the near and long term strategy improvement plans for the defined enhancements to the LLNS CAS. Review emphasis was placed on the CAS functional elements of Assessments, Issues Management, and Performance Measures, as well as the related CAS attributes of Requirements, Policies and Procedures, Risk Methodology, and Continuous Improvement. The approach taken by the team was to review the pertinent LLNL CAS documents, interview key CAS Process Owners, and interview selected line managers. The reviews were conducted in such a manner to achieve an understanding of the overall objective of the CAS and the processes within; and the soundness of the improvement plans for each of the elements/related attributes. The team then identified suggested recommendations for consideration as the overall implementation process for improvements move forward. The team appreciates the work that went into the development of the CAS Implementation Plan. It provided a meaningful starting place for this AIM team as it included sufficient information to quickly gain an understanding of the current LANS CAS processes and improvement initiatives. The team found that the July 2007 CAS Description Document did not provide a level of detail which would provide the reader an understanding of the elements and attributes of the CAS, how they are integrated, and how they help Managers manage the performance of their activities. Consider revising the document to include a level of detail that would provide value to the LLNS Board of Governors, LSO, and LLNL Managers. The team also found the description document to focus almost exclusively on describing the LLNS approach and initiatives associated with the 17 key attributes of Contract Clause H-4. While these discussions are appropriate for inclusion in the description document, by themselves, they do not clearly address the requirements and criteria in Attachment 1 and Appendix A to DOE 226.1A. It would seem that a comprehensive written CAS description document would address not only the expectations of Clause H-4, but that it would also address the requirements and criteria from DOE O 226.1A.