The Gas-Cooled Fast Reactor: Report on Safety System Design for Decay Heat Removal

Weaver, K. D. ; Marshall, T. ; Wei, T. Y. C. ; Feldman, E. E. ; Driscoll, M. J. ; Ludewig, H.

Idaho National Laboratory

关键词: Removal;    Heat Transfer;    Gas-Cooled Fast Reactor;    Power Density;    Reactor Safety;   

DOI  :  10.2172/910729
RP-ID  :  INEEL/EXT-03-01297
RP-ID  :  DE-AC07-99ID-13727
RP-ID  :  910729

美国|英语

来源: UNT Digital Library

【 摘 要 】

The gas-cooled fast reactor (GFR) was chosen as one of the Generation IV nuclear reactor systems to be developed based on its excellent potential for sustainability through reduction of the volume and radiotoxicity of both its own fuel and other spent nuclear fuel, and for extending/utilizing uranium resources orders of magnitude beyond what the current open fuel cycle can realize. In addition, energy conversion at high thermal efficiency is possible with the current designs being considered, thus increasing the economic benefit of the GFR. However, research and development challenges include the ability to use passive decay heat removal systems during accident conditions, survivability of fuels and in-core materials under extreme temperatures and radiation, and economical and efficient fuel cycle processes. This report addresses/discusses the decay heat removal options available to the GFR, and the current solutions. While it is possible to design a GFR with complete passive safety (i.e., reliance solely on conductive and radiative heat transfer for decay heat removal), it has been shown that the low power density results in unacceptable fuel cycle costs for the GFR. However, increasing power density results in higher decay heat rates, and the attendant temperature increase in the fuel and core. Use of active movers, or blowers/fans, is possible during accident conditions, which only requires 3% of nominal flow to remove the decay heat. Unfortunately, this requires reliance on active systems. In order to incorporate passive systems, innovative designs have been studied, and a mix of passive and active systems appears to meet the requirements for decay heat removal during accident conditions.