科技报告详细信息
Characterization and Qualification of New TATB and Kel-F 800 for LX-17
Hoffman, D M ; DePiero, S C
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
关键词: Mechanical Properties;    Distribution;    Kel-F;    Chemical Explosives;    Particle Size;   
DOI  :  10.2172/902257
RP-ID  :  UCRL-TR-228232
RP-ID  :  W-7405-ENG-48
RP-ID  :  902257
美国|英语
来源: UNT Digital Library
PDF
【 摘 要 】
The project would (1) compare new FK-800 with old Kel-F 800 and KF-800 lots currently available at LLNL, (2) compare and characterize new TATB with old TATB, (3) formulate new FK-800 with wet-aminated TATB and new TATBs in according to HAAP slurry coating procedure into LX-17-2, and (4) evaluate the mechanical and detonation performance characteristics of this insensitive high explosive (IHE). Priorities will be to prove that these new materials can be formulated, pressed to density and machined; and that they contain no impurities which might cause compatibility issues. Since 3M [1, 2], LANL [7], Pantex [8] and AWE [9, 10] are currently evaluating the new FK-800, we plan to share data rather than repeating their work. Our effort is briefly described: Task 1--Evaluation of newer characterization methods to identify structural variations between old and new Kel-F 800 including: Rheological and mechanical properties, copolymer content, degree of crystallinity, and interfacial interactions with TATB. Task 2--Evaluate TATBs using scattering techniques to replace sieving operations called out in the specification [12] for particle size distribution measurements. Use SEM and OM for morphological differences between the old and new explosives. Evaluate the compaction characteristics of new TATB. Task 3--Formulation of new LX-17-2 (with new FK-800 and/or new TATB) Task 4--Evaluate mechanical and performance properties of LX-17-2. At a minimum, compressive strength, dynamic mechanical behavior and a 2-inch cylinder shot should be performed and compared with existing data for LX-17-1.
【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
902257.pdf 248KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:4次 浏览次数:45次