Low-Cost Options for Moderate Levels of Mercury Control | |
Sjostrom, Sharon | |
ADA-ES, Inc. | |
关键词: Removal; Powder River Basin; Particulates; Testing; Activated Carbon; | |
DOI : 10.2172/899759 RP-ID : None RP-ID : FC26-05NT42307 RP-ID : 899759 |
|
美国|英语 | |
来源: UNT Digital Library | |
【 摘 要 】
On March 15, 2005, EPA issued the Clean Air Mercury Rule, requiring phased-in reductions of mercury emissions from electric power generators. ADA-ES, Inc., with support from DOE/NETL and industry partners, is conducting evaluations of EPRI's TOXECON II{trademark} process and of high-temperature reagents and sorbents to determine the capabilities of sorbent/reagent injection, including activated carbon, for mercury control on different coals and air emissions control equipment configurations. DOE/NETL targets for total mercury removal are {ge}55% (lignite), {ge}65% (subbituminous), and {ge}80% (bituminous). Based on work done to date at various scales, meeting the removal targets appears feasible. However, work needs to progress to more thoroughly document and test these promising technologies at full scale. This is the final site report for tests conducted at MidAmerican's Louisa Station, one of three sites evaluated in this DOE/NETL program. The other two sites in the program are MidAmerican's Council Bluff Station and Entergy's Independence Station. MidAmerican's Louisa Station burns Powder River Basin (PRB) coal and employs hot-side electrostatic precipitators with flue gas conditioning for particulate control. This part of the testing program evaluated the effect of reagents used in the existing flue gas conditioning on mercury removal.
【 预 览 】
Files | Size | Format | View |
---|---|---|---|
899759.pdf | 3220KB | download |