Laboratory Information Management Systems for Forensic Laboratories: A White Paper for Directors and Decision Makers

Hendrickson, Anthony ; Mennecke, Brian ; Scheibe, Kevin ; Townsend, Anthony

Ames Laboratory

关键词: Data Base Management;    Laboratories;    Crime Detection;    Information Systems;    99 General And Miscellaneous//Mathematics, Computing, And Information Science;   

DOI  :  10.2172/892806
RP-ID  :  IS-5175
RP-ID  :  W-7405-Eng-82
RP-ID  :  892806

美国|英语

来源: UNT Digital Library

【 摘 要 】

Modern, forensics laboratories need Laboratory Information Management Systems (LIMS) implementations that allow the lab to track evidentiary items through their examination lifecycle and also serve all pertinent laboratory personnel. The research presented here presents LIMS core requirements as viewed by respondents serving in different forensic laboratory capacities as well as different forensic laboratory environments. A product-development methodology was employed to evaluate the relative value of the key features that constitute a LIMS, in order to develop a set of relative values for these features and the specifics of their implementation. In addition to the results of the product development analysis, this paper also provides an extensive review of LIMS and provides an overview of the preparation and planning process for the successful upgrade or implementation of a LIMS. Analysis of the data indicate that the relative value of LIMS components are viewed differently depending upon respondents' job roles (i.e., evidence technicians, scientists, and lab management), as well as by laboratory size. Specifically, the data show that: (1) Evidence technicians place the most value on chain of evidence capabilities and on chain of custody tracking; (2) Scientists generally place greatest value on report writing and generation, and on tracking daughter evidence that develops during their analyses; (3) Lab. Managers place the greatest value on chain of custody, daughter evidence, and not surprisingly, management reporting capabilities; and (4) Lab size affects LIMS preference in that, while all labs place daughter evidence tracking, chain of custody, and management and analyst report generation as their top three priorities, the order of this prioritization is size dependent.