Advanced ST Plasma Scenario Simulations for NSTX

Kessel, C.E. ; Synakowski, E.J. ; Gates, D.A. ; Harvey, R.W. ; Kaye, S.M. ; Mau, T.K. ; Menard, J. ; Phillips, C.K. ; Taylor, G. ; Wilson, R. ; Team, the NSTX Research

Princeton University. Plasma Physics Laboratory.

关键词: Heating;    High-Beta Plasmas;    70 Plasma Physics And Fusion Technology;    Spherical Torus;    Start-Up;   

DOI  :  10.2172/836094
RP-ID  :  PPPL-4017
RP-ID  :  AC02-76CH03073
RP-ID  :  836094

美国|英语

来源: UNT Digital Library

【 摘 要 】

Integrated scenario simulations are done for NSTX [National Spherical Torus Experiment] that address four primary milestones for developing advanced ST configurations: high {beta} and high {beta}{sub N} inductive discharges to study all aspects of ST physics in the high-beta regime; non-inductively sustained discharges for flattop times greater than the skin time to study the various current-drive techniques; non-inductively sustained discharges at high {beta} for flattop times much greater than a skin time which provides the integrated advanced ST target for NSTX; and non-solenoidal start-up and plasma current ramp-up. The simulations done here use the Tokamak Simulation Code (TSC) and are based on a discharge 109070. TRANSP analysis of the discharge provided the thermal diffusivities for electrons and ions, the neutral-beam (NB) deposition profile, and other characteristics. CURRAY is used to calculate the High Harmonic Fast Wave (HHFW) heating depositions and current drive. GENRAY/CQL3D is used to establish the heating and CD [current drive] deposition profiles for electron Bernstein waves (EBW). Analysis of the ideal-MHD stability is done with JSOLVER, BALMSC, and PEST2. The simulations indicate that the integrated advanced ST plasma is reachable, obtaining stable plasmas with {beta} {approx} 40% at {beta}{sub N}'s of 7.7-9, I{sub P} = 1.0 MA, and B{sub T} = 0.35 T. The plasma is 100% non-inductive and has a flattop of 4 skin times. The resulting global energy confinement corresponds to a multiplier of H{sub 98(y,2)} = 1.5. The simulations have demonstrated the importance of HHFW heating and CD, EBW off-axis CD, strong plasma shaping, density control, and early heating/H-mode transition for producing and optimizing these plasma configurations.