科技报告详细信息
Data quality objectives for moisture measurement in stabilized special nuclear material
Weier, DR ; Pulsipher, BA ; Silvers, KL
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (U.S.)
关键词: Sludges;    Quality Assurance;    Radioactive Materials;    Oxides;    Water;   
DOI  :  10.2172/756161
RP-ID  :  PNNL-13256
RP-ID  :  AC06-76RL01830
RP-ID  :  756161
美国|英语
来源: UNT Digital Library
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Data Quality Objectives methodology is applied to Loss-on-Ignition (LOI) moisture content testing for stabilized nuclear materials. This work was performed by Pacific Northwest National Laboratory in support of the Plutonium Finishing Plant (PFP)/Fluor Hanford, Inc. Historical results on LOI test results for two material types, oxide and sludge, are used to estimate within container variability. This variability estimate is then used in formulating the two recommended acceptance criteria for containers of material. The criteria which follow are proposed to replace the current criterion, which requires recycle if either of two container LOI measurements exceed 0.5 wt%, the DOE Standard 3013-99 threshold value. (1) The 95% upper confidence limit (UCL) for the true mean underlying moisture content in the container material should be less than 0.5 wt%. (2) The difference between the two LOI measurements per container should not exceed their expected 95th percentile relative to the estimated variability. Containers not meeting the first criterion, or those that generate in any negative LOI result, require material recycle. Containers not meeting the second criteria require review of the measurement results, potentially leading to resampling and retesting. Data from Los Alamos National Laboratory studies on moisture testing are obtained and analyzed. The performance of Supercritical Fluid Extraction (SFE), which will soon be implemented at the PFP, is described for several material types. This information will be used to establish initial acceptance criteria when SFE comes on line.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
756161.pdf 1869KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:13次 浏览次数:14次