科技报告详细信息
Reactor Testing and Qualification: Prioritized High-level Criticality Testing Needs
Bragg-Sitton, S. ; Bess, J. ; Werner, J. ; Harms, G. ; Bailey, S.
Idaho National Laboratory
关键词: Criticality;    Fission;    Recommendations;    Lanl;    Ineel;   
DOI  :  10.2172/1027922
RP-ID  :  INL/EXT-11-22725
RP-ID  :  DE-AC07-05ID14517
RP-ID  :  1027922
美国|英语
来源: UNT Digital Library
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Researchers at the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) were tasked with reviewing possible criticality testing needs to support development of the fission surface power system reactor design. Reactor physics testing can provide significant information to aid in development of technologies associated with small, fast spectrum reactors that could be applied for non-terrestrial power systems, leading to eventual system qualification. Several studies have been conducted in recent years to assess the data and analyses required to design and build a space fission power system with high confidence that the system will perform as designed [Marcille, 2004a, 2004b; Weaver, 2007; Parry et al., 2008]. This report will provide a summary of previous critical tests and physics measurements that are potentially applicable to the current reactor design (both those that have been benchmarked and those not yet benchmarked), summarize recent studies of potential nuclear testing needs for space reactor development and their applicability to the current baseline fission surface power (FSP) system design, and provide an overview of a suite of tests (separate effects, sub-critical or critical) that could fill in the information database to improve the accuracy of physics modeling efforts as the FSP design is refined. Some recommendations for tasks that could be completed in the near term are also included. Specific recommendations on critical test configurations will be reserved until after the sensitivity analyses being conducted by Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) are completed (due August 2011).

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
1027922.pdf 577KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:9次 浏览次数:11次