THE IMPACT OF THE MCU LIFE EXTENSION SOLVENT ON DWPF GLASS FORMULATION EFFORTS

Peeler, D. ; Edwards, T.

Savannah River Site (S.C.)

关键词: Modifications;    Radioactive Waste Facilities;    Waste Forms;    Boric Acid;    Materials Testing;   

DOI  :  10.2172/1010510
RP-ID  :  SRNL-STI-2011-00110
RP-ID  :  DE-AC09-08SR22470
RP-ID  :  1010510

美国|英语

来源: UNT Digital Library

【 摘 要 】

As a part of the Actinide Removal Process (ARP)/Modular Caustic Side Solvent Extraction Unit (MCU) Life Extension Project, a next generation solvent (NG-CSSX), a new strip acid, and modified monosodium titanate (mMST) will be deployed. The strip acid will be changed from dilute nitric acid to dilute boric acid (0.01 M). Because of these changes, experimental testing with the next generation solvent and mMST is required to determine the impact of these changes in 512-S operations as well as Chemical Process Cell (CPC), Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) glass formulation activities, and melter operations at DWPF. To support programmatic objectives, the downstream impacts of the boric acid strip effluent (SE) to the glass formulation activities and melter operations are considered in this study. More specifically, the impacts of boric acid additions to the projected SB7b operating windows, potential impacts to frit production temperatures, and the potential impact of boron volatility are evaluated. Although various boric acid molarities have been reported and discussed, the baseline flowsheet used to support this assessment was 0.01M boric acid. The results of the paper study assessment indicate that Frit 418 and Frit 418-7D are robust to the implementation of the 0.01M boric acid SE into the SB7b flowsheet (sludge-only or ARP-added). More specifically, the projected operating windows for the nominal SB7b projections remain essentially constant (i.e., 25-43 or 25-44% waste loading (WL)) regardless of the flowsheet options (sludge-only, ARP added, and/or the presence of the new SE). These results indicate that even if SE is not transferred to the Sludge Receipt and Adjustment Tank (SRAT), there would be no need to add boric acid (from a trim tank) to compositionally compensate for the absence of the boric acid SE in either a sludge-only or ARP-added SB7b flowsheet. With respect to boron volatility, the Measurement Acceptability Region (MAR) assessments also suggest that Slurry Mix Evaporator (SME) acceptability decisions would not be different assuming either 100% of the B{sub 2}O{sub 3} from the SE were retained or volatilized. More specifically, the 0.84 wt% B{sub 2}O{sub 3} in the SE is so minor that its presence in the SME analysis does not influence SME acceptability decisions. In fact, using the 100% retention and 100% volatilization composition projections, only minor differences in the predicted properties of the glass product occur with all of the glasses being acceptable over a WL interval of 32-42%. Based on the 0.01M boric acid flowsheet, there is very little difference between Frit 418 and Frit 418-7D (a frit that was compositionally altered to account for the 0.84 wt% B{sub 2}O{sub 3} in the SE) with respect to melt temperature. In fact, when one evaluates the composition of Frit 418-7D, it lies within the current Frit 418 vendor specifications and therefore could have been produced by the vendor targeting the nominal composition of Frit 418.