Final Report DE-FG02-04ER63719

Lovley, Derek, R.

关键词: ACETATES;    ADSORPTION;    AQUIFERS;    BINDING ENERGY;    BIOMASS;    BIOREMEDIATION;    CONTAMINATION;    DESIGN;    ELECTRODES;    ELECTRONS;    REMOVAL;    URANIUM;    VALENCE Geobacter;    subsurface microbiology;    uranium;   

DOI  :  10.2172/924890
RP-ID  :  DOE/FE/63719-Final Report
PID  :  OSTI ID: 924890
Others  :  TRN: US1003223

学科分类：环境科学（综合）

美国|英语

来源: SciTech Connect

【 摘 要 】

The studies completed under this grant significantly advanced the understanding and design of strategies for in situ uranium bioremediation. Novel strategies identified show promise to make in situ uranium bioremediation technically simpler and less expensive. As detailed, important findings included: (1) Development of an electron donor delivery strategy to prolong the in situ activity of Geobacter species and enhance the removal of uranium from the groundwater; (2) Demonstration that reproducible year-to-year field experiments were possible at the ERSP study site in Rifle, CO, making hypothesis-driven field experimentation possible; (3) Elucidation of the geochemical and microbiological heterogeneities with the subsurface during in situ uranium bioremediation, which must be accounted for to accurately model the bioremediation process; (4) The discovery that most of the U(VI) contamination at the Rifle site is sediment-associated rather than mobile in the groundwater, as previously considered; (5) The finding that unlike soluble U(VI), sediment-associated U(VI) is not microbially reducible; (6) The demonstration that electrodes may be an effective alternative to acetate as an electron donor to promote microbial U(VI) reduction in the subsurface with the added benefit that electrode-promoted microbial U(VI) reduction offers the possibility of removing the immobilized uranium from the subsurface; and (7) The finding that, after extended acetate inputs, U(VI) continues to be removed from groundwater long after the introduction of acetate into the subsurface is terminated and that this appears to be due to adsorption onto biomass. This potentially will make in situ uranium bioremediation much less expensive than previously envisioned.