Enhanced Verification Test Suite for Physics Simulation Codes

Kamm, J R ; Brock, J S ; Brandon, S T ; Cotrell, D L ; Johnson, B ; Knupp, P ; Rider, W ; Trucano, T ; Weirs, V G

关键词: A CODES;    ALGORITHMS;    BENCHMARKS;    COMPUTERIZED SIMULATION;    HYDRODYNAMICS;    LANL;    LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL LABORATORY;    PHYSICS;    SANDIA NATIONAL LABORATORIES;    SIMULATION;    TRANSPORT;    VALIDATION;    VERIFICATION;   

DOI  :  10.2172/950084
RP-ID  :  LLNL-TR-411291
PID  :  OSTI ID: 950084
Others  :  TRN: US200910%%170

学科分类：物理（综合）

美国|英语

来源: SciTech Connect

【 摘 要 】

This document discusses problems with which to augment, in quantity and in quality, the existing tri-laboratory suite of verification problems used by Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), and Sandia National Laboratories (SNL). The purpose of verification analysis is demonstrate whether the numerical results of the discretization algorithms in physics and engineering simulation codes provide correct solutions of the corresponding continuum equations. The key points of this document are: (1) Verification deals with mathematical correctness of the numerical algorithms in a code, while validation deals with physical correctness of a simulation in a regime of interest. This document is about verification. (2) The current seven-problem Tri-Laboratory Verification Test Suite, which has been used for approximately five years at the DOE WP laboratories, is limited. (3) Both the methodology for and technology used in verification analysis have evolved and been improved since the original test suite was proposed. (4) The proposed test problems are in three basic areas: (a) Hydrodynamics; (b) Transport processes; and (c) Dynamic strength-of-materials. (5) For several of the proposed problems we provide a 'strong sense verification benchmark', consisting of (i) a clear mathematical statement of the problem with sufficient information to run a computer simulation, (ii) an explanation of how the code result and benchmark solution are to be evaluated, and (iii) a description of the acceptance criterion for simulation code results. (6) It is proposed that the set of verification test problems with which any particular code be evaluated include some of the problems described in this document. Analysis of the proposed verification test problems constitutes part of a necessary--but not sufficient--step that builds confidence in physics and engineering simulation codes. More complicated test cases, including physics models of greater sophistication or other physics regimes (e.g., energetic material response, magneto-hydrodynamics), would represent a scientifically desirable complement to the fundamental test cases discussed in this report. The authors believe that this document can be used to enhance the verification analyses undertaken at the DOE WP Laboratories and, thus, to improve the quality, credibility, and usefulness of the simulation codes that are analyzed with these problems.