Laboratory Demonstration of the Pretreatment Process with Caustic and Oxidative Leaching Using Actual Hanford Tank Waste

Fiskum, Sandra K. ; Billing, Justin M. ; Buck, Edgar C. ; Daniel, Richard C. ; Draper, Kathryn E. ; Edwards, Matthew K. ; Jenson, Evan D. ; Kozelisky, Anne E. ; MacFarlan, Paul J. ; Peterson, Reid A. ; Shimskey, Rick W. ; Snow, Lanee A.

关键词: AR FACILITIES;    HANFORD RESERVATION;    RADIOACTIVE WASTES;    RADIOACTIVE WASTE PROCESSING;    LEACHING;    ALKALINE HYDROLYSIS;    OXIDATION;    FILTRATION;    ION EXCHANGE;    EVAPORATION;   

DOI  :  10.2172/963203
RP-ID  :  PNNL-18007
PID  :  OSTI ID: 963203
Others  :  Other: 830403000
Others  :  TRN: US0903181

学科分类：核能源与工程

美国|英语

来源: SciTech Connect

【 摘 要 】

This report describes the bench-scale pretreatment processing of actual tank waste materials through the entire baseline WTP pretreatment flowsheet in an effort to demonstrate the efficacy of the defined leaching processes on actual Hanford tank waste sludge and the potential impacts on downstream pretreatment processing. The test material was a combination of reduction oxidation (REDOX) tank waste composited materials containing aluminum primarily in the form of boehmite and dissolved S saltcake containing Cr(III)-rich entrained solids. The pretreatment processing steps tested included • caustic leaching for Al removal • solids crossflow filtration through the cell unit filter (CUF) • stepwise solids washing using decreasing concentrations of sodium hydroxide with filtration through the CUF • oxidative leaching using sodium permanganate for removing Cr • solids filtration with the CUF • follow-on solids washing and filtration through the CUF • ion exchange processing for Cs removal • evaporation processing of waste stream recycle for volume reduction • combination of the evaporated product with dissolved saltcake. The effectiveness of each process step was evaluated by following the mass balance of key components (such as Al, B, Cd, Cr, Pu, Ni, Mn, and Fe), demonstrating component (Al, Cr, Cs) removal, demonstrating filterability by evaluating filter flux rates under various processing conditions (transmembrane pressure, crossflow velocities, wt% undissolved solids, and PSD) and filter fouling, and identifying potential issues for WTP. The filterability was reported separately (Shimskey et al. 2008) and is not repeated herein.