Pulse Jet Mixing Tests With Noncohesive Solids

Meyer, Perry A. ; Bamberger, Judith A. ; Enderlin, Carl W. ; Fort, James A. ; Wells, Beric E. ; Sundaram, S. K. ; Scott, Paul A. ; Minette, Michael J. ; Smith, Gary L. ; Burns, Carolyn A. ; Greenwood, Margaret S. ; Morgen, Gerald P. ; Baer, Ellen BK ; Snyder, Sandra F

关键词: AR FACILITIES;    CLOUDS;    DESIGN;    NOZZLES;    PERFORMANCE;    VELOCITY;    WASTE PROCESSING;    WASTES;    MIXING;    HANFORD RESERVATION;    LIQUID FLOW;    LIQUID WASTES;   

DOI  :  10.2172/956900
RP-ID  :  PNNL-18098
PID  :  OSTI ID: 956900
Others  :  Other: 830403000
Others  :  TRN: US1005013

学科分类：核能源与工程

美国|英语

来源: SciTech Connect

【 摘 要 】

This report summarizes results from pulse jet mixing (PJM) tests with noncohesive solids in Newtonian liquid conducted during FY 2007 and 2008 to support the design of mixing systems for the Hanford Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP). Tests were conducted at three geometric scales using noncohesive simulants. The test data were used to independently develop mixing models that can be used to predict full-scale WTP vessel performance and to rate current WTP mixing system designs against two specific performance requirements. One requirement is to ensure that all solids have been disturbed during the mixing action, which is important to release gas from the solids. The second requirement is to maintain a suspended solids concentration below 20 weight percent at the pump inlet. The models predict the height to which solids will be lifted by the PJM action, and the minimum velocity needed to ensure all solids have been lifted from the floor. From the cloud height estimate we can calculate the concentration of solids at the pump inlet. The velocity needed to lift the solids is slightly more demanding than "disturbing" the solids, and is used as a surrogate for this metric. We applied the models to assess WTP mixing vessel performance with respect to the two performÂŹance requirements. Each mixing vessel was evaluated against these two criteria for two defined waste conditions. One of the wastes was defined by design limits and one was derived from Hanford waste characterization reports. The assessment predicts that three vessel types will satisfy the design criteria for all conditions evaluated. Seven vessel types will not satisfy the performance criteria used for any of the conditions evaluated. The remaining three vessel types provide varying assessments when the different particle characteristics are evaluated. The assessment predicts that three vessel types will satisfy the design criteria for all conditions evaluated. Seven vessel types will not satisfy the performance criteria used for any of the conditions evaluated. The remaining three vessel types provide varying assessments when the different particle characteristics are evaluated. The HLP-022 vessel was also evaluated using 12 m/s pulse jet velocity with 6-in. nozzles, and this design also did not satisfy the criteria for all of the conditions evaluated.