科技报告详细信息
GLASS COMPOSITIONS FOR THE NEPHELINE PHASE III STUDY
Fox, K. ; Edwards, T.
关键词: CONTROL SYSTEMS;    DISCRIMINATORS;    GLASS;    IMPLEMENTATION;    PROCESSING;    TESTING;    WASTE PROCESSING;   
DOI  :  10.2172/958684
RP-ID  :  SRNL-STI-2009-00375
PID  :  OSTI ID: 958684
Others  :  TRN: US201016%%541
学科分类:材料科学(综合)
美国|英语
来源: SciTech Connect
PDF
【 摘 要 】
A series of 29 test glass compositions were selected for Phase III of the nepheline study using a combination of two approaches. The first approach was based on evaluating the glass composition region allowable by all of the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) Product Composition Control System (PCCS) models with the exception of the current nepheline discriminator. This approach was taken to determine whether there are glass compositions that, while predicted to crystallize nepheline upon slow cooling, would otherwise be acceptable for processing in the DWPF. The second approach was based on quasicrystalline theory of glass structure, which helped predict compositional regions where nepheline should form. A detailed description of this methodology is forthcoming. The selection strategy outlined here will provide an opportunity to determine experimentally whether the glasses that fail the current nepheline discriminator but pass the newly proposed nepheline discriminator are indeed free of nepheline after slow cooling. If this is the case, these data will serve as a significant step toward reducing conservatism in the current nepheline discriminator. The 29 glass compositions selected for testing address both the PCCS model and quasicrystalline theory approaches in evaluating both a reduction in conservatism for the current nepheline discriminator and possible implementation of the newly proposed discriminator based on glass structural theory. These glasses will be fabricated and characterized in the laboratory, with the results and conclusions described in a technical report.
【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO201705170001756LZ 420KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:11次 浏览次数:8次