CREATION OF THE MODEL ADDITIONAL PROTOCOL

Houck, F. ; Rosenthal, M. ; Wulf, N.

关键词: AGREEMENTS;    IAEA;    IMPLEMENTATION;    INFORMATION;    IRAQ;    MATERIALS;    MEMBER STATES;    NEGOTIATION;    NUCLEAR POTENTIAL;    NUCLEAR WEAPONS;    PROLIFERAT;   

DOI  :  10.2172/1001740
RP-ID  :  BNL--91421-2010
PID  :  OSTI ID: 1001740
Others  :  R&D Project: 10145
Others  :  10146
Others  :  Other: 2221195
Others  :  TRN: US201104%%120

美国|英语

来源: SciTech Connect

【 摘 要 】

In 1991, the international nuclear nonproliferation community was dismayed to discover that the implementation of safeguards by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) under its NPT INFCIRC/153 safeguards agreement with Iraq had failed to detect Iraq's nuclear weapon program. It was now clear that ensuring that states were fulfilling their obligations under the NPT would require not just detecting diversion but also the ability to detect undeclared materials and activities. To achieve this, the IAEA initiated what would turn out to be a five-year effort to reappraise the NPT safeguards system. The effort engaged the IAEA and its Member States and led to agreement in 1997 on a new safeguards agreement, the Model Protocol Additional to the Agreement(s) between States and the International Atomic Energy Agency for the Application of Safeguards. The Model Protocol makes explicit that one IAEA goal is to provide assurance of the absence of undeclared nuclear material and activities. The Model Protocol requires an expanded declaration that identifies a State's nuclear potential, empowers the IAEA to raise questions about the correctness and completeness of the State's declaration, and, if needed, allows IAEA access to locations. The information required and the locations available for access are much broader than those provided for under INFCIRC/153. The negotiation was completed in quite a short time because it started with a relatively complete draft of an agreement prepared by the IAEA Secretariat. This paper describes how the Model Protocol was constructed and reviews key decisions that were made both during the five-year period and in the actual negotiation.