科技报告详细信息
Corrective Action Decision Document for Corrective Action Unit 562: Waste Systems Nevada Test Site, Nevada, Revision 0
Mark Krause
关键词: CLOSURES;    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION;    EVALUATION;    FOCUSING;    MANAGEMENT;    NEVADA TEST SITE;    ORDERS;    PERFORMANCE;    RECOMMENDATIONS;    REGULATIONS;    RELIABILITY;    SAFETY;    SECURITY;    US DOD;    WASTES;   
DOI  :  10.2172/989394
RP-ID  :  DOE/NV--1396
PID  :  OSTI ID: 989394
Others  :  TRN: US201019%%610
学科分类:环境科学(综合)
美国|英语
来源: SciTech Connect
PDF
【 摘 要 】

This Corrective Action Decision Document (CADD) presents information supporting the selection of corrective action alternatives (CAAs) leading to the closure of Corrective Action Unit (CAU) 562, Waste Systems, in Areas 2, 23, and 25 of the Nevada Test Site, Nevada. This complies with the requirements of the Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (FFACO) that was agreed to by the State of Nevada; U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Environmental Management; U.S. Department of Defense; and DOE, Legacy Management. Corrective Action Unit 562 comprises the following corrective action sites (CASs): ??? 02-26-11, Lead Shot ??? 02-44-02, Paint Spills and French Drain ??? 02-59-01, Septic System ??? 02-60-01, Concrete Drain ??? 02-60-02, French Drain ??? 02-60-03, Steam Cleaning Drain ??? 02-60-04, French Drain ??? 02-60-05, French Drain ??? 02-60-06, French Drain ??? 02-60-07, French Drain ??? 23-60-01, Mud Trap Drain and Outfall ??? 23-99-06, Grease Trap ??? 25-60-04, Building 3123 Outfalls The purpose of this CADD is to identify and provide the rationale for the recommendation of CAAs for the 13 CASs within CAU 562. Corrective action investigation (CAI) activities were performed from July 27, 2009, through May 12, 2010, as set forth in the CAU 562 Corrective Action Investigation Plan. The purpose of the CAI was to fulfill the following data needs as defined during the data quality objective (DQO) process: ??? Determine whether COCs are present. ??? If COCs are present, determine their nature and extent. ??? Provide sufficient information and data to complete appropriate corrective actions. A data quality assessment (DQA) performed on the CAU 562 data demonstrated the quality and acceptability of the data for use in fulfilling the DQO data needs. Analytes detected during the CAI were evaluated against appropriate final action levels (FALs) to identify the COCs for each CAS. The results of the CAI identified COCs at 10 of the 13 CASs in CAU 562, and thus corrective action is required. Assessment of the data generated from investigation activities conducted at CAU 562 is shown in Table ES-1. Based on the evaluation of analytical data from the CAI, review of future and current operations at the 13 CASs, and the detailed and comparative analysis of the potential CAAs, the following corrective actions are recommended for CAU 562. ??? No further action is the preferred corrective action for CASs 02-60-01, 02-60-06, and 02-60-07. ??? Clean closure is the preferred corrective action for CASs 02-26-11, 02-44-02, 02-59-01, 02-60-02, 02-60-03, 02-60-04, 02-60-05, 23-60-01, 23-99-06, and 25-60-04. The preferred CAAs were evaluated on technical merit focusing on performance, reliability, feasibility, safety, and cost. The alternatives were judged to meet all requirements for the technical components evaluated. The alternatives meet all applicable federal and state regulations for closure of the site and will reduce potential exposures to contaminated media to acceptable levels. The DOE, National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Site Office provides the following recommendations: ??? No further corrective action is required at CASs 02-60-01, 02-60-06, and 02-60-07. ??? Clean closure is recommended for the remaining 10 CASs in CAU 562. ??? A Corrective Action Plan will be submitted to the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection that contains a detailed description of the proposed actions that will be taken to implement the selected corrective actions.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO201704240001554LZ 13318KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:8次 浏览次数:13次