Global Radiological Source Sorting, Tracking, and Monitoring Project: Phase I Final Report | |
Walker, Randy M1  Hill, David E1  Gorman, Bryan L1  | |
[1] ORNL | |
关键词: RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS; MONITORING; POSTAL SERVICES; IDENTIFICATION SYSTEMS; TRANSPORT; RADIO EQUIPMENT; PERFORMANCE TESTING RFID Tracking; Web 2.0; supply chain; hazardous shipments; | |
DOI : 10.2172/992555 RP-ID : ORNL/TM-2010/237 PID : OSTI ID: 992555 Others : Other: 400408000 Others : TRN: US1007892 |
|
学科分类:工程和技术(综合) | |
美国|英语 | |
来源: SciTech Connect | |
【 摘 要 】
As a proof of concept tested in an operational context, the Global Radiological Source Sorting, Tracking, and Monitoring (GRadSSTraM) Project successfully demonstrated that radio frequency identification (RFID) and Web 2.0* technologies can be deployed to track controlled shipments between the United States and the European Union. Between November 2009 and May 2010, a total of 19 shipments were successfully shipped from Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) by the U.S. Postal Service (USPS) and tracked to their delivery at England's National Physical Laboratory (NPL) by the United Kingdom Royal Mail. However, the project can only be viewed as a qualified success as notable shortcomings were observed. Although the origin and terminus of all RFID-enabled shipments were recorded and no shipments were lost, not all the waypoints between ORNL and NPL were incorporated into the pilot. Given limited resources, the project team was able to install RFID listeners/actuators at three waypoints between the two endpoints. Although it is likely that all shipments followed the same route between ORNL and NPL, it cannot be determined beyond question that all 19 shipments were routed on identical itineraries past the same three waypoints. The pilot also raises the distinct possibility that unattended RFID tracking alone, without positive confirmation that a tagged item has been properly recorded by an RFID reader, does not meet a rigorous standard for shipping controlled items. Indeed, the proof of concept test strongly suggests that a multifaceted approach to tracking may be called for, including tracking methods that are capable of reading and accepting multiple inputs for individual items [e.g., carrier-provided tracking numbers, Universal Product Codes (UPCs), and RFID tags]. For controlled items, another apparent requirement is a confirmation feature, human or otherwise, which can certify that an item's RFID tag, UPC, or tracking number has been recorded.
【 预 览 】
Files | Size | Format | View |
---|---|---|---|
RO201704240001137LZ | 728KB | download |