| Water Use in Parabolic Trough Power Plants: Summary Results from WorleyParsons' Analyses | |
| Turchi, C. S. ; Wagner, M. J. ; Kutscher, C. F. | |
| 关键词: COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; COOLING; COOLING SYSTEMS; COST; EVAPORATIVE COOLING; NATIONAL RENEWABLE ENERGY LABORATORY; PARABOLIC TROUGH COLLECTORS; PERFORMANCE; SOLAR POWER PLANTS; WATER; | |
| DOI : 10.2172/1001357 RP-ID : NREL/TP-5500-49468 PID : OSTI ID: 1001357 Others : TRN: US201104%%79 |
|
| 美国|英语 | |
| 来源: SciTech Connect | |
PDF
|
|
【 摘 要 】
The National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) contracted with WorleyParsons Group, Inc. to examine the effect of switching from evaporative cooling to alternative cooling systems on a nominal 100-MW parabolic trough concentrating solar power (CSP) plant. WorleyParsons analyzed 13 different cases spanning three different geographic locations (Daggett, California; Las Vegas, Nevada; and Alamosa, Colorado) to assess the performance, cost, and water use impacts of switching from wet to dry or hybrid cooling systems. NREL developed matching cases in its Solar Advisor Model (SAM) for each scenario to allow for hourly modeling and provide a comparison to the WorleyParsons results.Our findings indicate that switching from 100% wet to 100% dry cooling will result in levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) increases of approximately 3% to 8% for parabolic trough plants throughout most of the southwestern United States. In cooler, high-altitude areas like Colorado's San Luis Valley, WorleyParsons estimated the increase at only 2.5%, while SAM predicted a 4.4% difference. In all cases, the transition to dry cooling will reduce water consumption by over 90%. Utility time-of-delivery (TOD) schedules had similar impacts for wet- and dry-cooled plants, suggesting that TOD schedules have a relatively minor effect on the dry-cooling penalty.
【 预 览 】
| Files | Size | Format | View |
|---|---|---|---|
| RO201704240000271LZ | 3688KB |
PDF