科技报告详细信息
Final Long-Term Management and Storage of Elemental Mercury Environmental Impact Statement Summary and Guide for Stakeholders
关键词: BUILDINGS;    CONTROL;    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENTS;    EXPORTS;    HUMAN POPULATIONS;    KANSAS CITY PLANT;    MANAGEMENT;    MERCURY;    METRICS;    POTENTIALS;    REGULATIONS;    RESOURCE CONSERVATION;    SOLID WASTES;    STORAGE;    US CEQ;    US NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT;    WASTES;   
DOI  :  10.2172/1004941
RP-ID  :  DOE/EIS-0423
PID  :  OSTI ID: 1004941
Others  :  TRN: US201106%%43
学科分类:能源(综合)
美国|英语
来源: SciTech Connect
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Pursuant to the Mercury Export Ban Act of 2008 (P.L. 110-414), DOE was directed to designate a facility or facilities for the long-term management and storage of elemental mercury generated within the United States. Therefore, DOE has analyzed the storage of up to 10,000 metric tons (11,000 tons) of elemental mercury in a facility(ies) constructed and operated in accordance with the Solid Waste Disposal Act, as amended by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (74 FR 31723). DOE prepared this Final Mercury Storage EIS in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), as amended (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) implementing regulations (40 CFR 1500???1508), and DOE???s NEPA implementing procedures (10 CFR 1021) to evaluate reasonable alternatives for a facility(ies) for the long-term management and storage of elemental mercury. This Final Mercury Storage EIS analyzes the potential environmental, human health, and socioeconomic impacts of elemental mercury storage at seven candidate locations: Grand Junction Disposal Site near Grand Junction, Colorado; Hanford Site near Richland, Washington; Hawthorne Army Depot near Hawthorne, Nevada; Idaho National Laboratory near Idaho Falls, Idaho; Kansas City Plant in Kansas City, Missouri; Savannah River Site near Aiken, South Carolina; and Waste Control Specialists, LLC, site near Andrews, Texas. As required by CEQ NEPA regulations, the No Action Alternative was also analyzed as a basis for comparison. DOE intends to decide (1) where to locate the elemental mercury storage facility(ies) and (2) whether to use existing buildings, new buildings, or a combination of existing and new buildings. DOE???s Preferred Alternative for the long-term management and storage of mercury is the Waste Control Specialists, LLC, site near Andrews, Texas.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO201704210003437LZ 29581KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:4次 浏览次数:8次