Tritium Permeability of Incoloy 800H and Inconel 617

Philip Winston ; Pattrick Calderoni ; Paul Humrickhouse

关键词: ABSORPTION;    ALLOYS;    CHEMICAL COMPOSITION;    CONTAMINATION;    COOLANTS;    FISSION;    HEAT EXCHANGERS;    HELIUM;    HYDROGEN;    HYDROGEN ISOTOPES;    IDAHO NATIONAL LABORATORY;    INCOLOY 800H;    INCONEL 617;    MIXTURES;    OXIDES;    PARTIAL PRESSURE;    PERMEABILITY;    REACTOR COMPONENTS;    SAFETY;    TRITIUM NGNP + TDO + VHTR + R&D + Fuel + AGR-1 + AG;   

DOI  :  10.2172/1033884
RP-ID  :  INL/EXT-11-23265
PID  :  OSTI ID: 1033884
Others  :  TRN: US1200666

美国|英语

来源: SciTech Connect

【 摘 要 】

Design of the Next Generation Nuclear Plant (NGNP) reactor and its high-temperature components requires information regarding the permeation of fission generated tritium and hydrogen product through candidate heat exchanger alloys. Release of fission-generated tritium to the environment and the potential contamination of the helium coolant by permeation of product hydrogen into the coolant system represent safety basis and product contamination issues. Of the three potential candidates for high-temperature components of the NGNP reactor design, only permeability for Incoloy 800H has been well documented. Hydrogen permeability data have been published for Inconel 617, but only in two literature reports and for partial pressures of hydrogen greater than one atmosphere, far higher than anticipated in the NGNP reactor. To support engineering design of the NGNP reactor components, the tritium permeability of Inconel 617 and Incoloy 800H was determined using a measurement system designed and fabricated at Idaho National Laboratory. The tritium permeability of Incoloy 800H and Inconel 617, was measured in the temperature range 650 to 950 C and at primary concentrations of 1.5 to 6 parts per million volume tritium in helium. (partial pressures of 10-6 atm) - three orders of magnitude lower partial pressures than used in the hydrogen permeation testing. The measured tritium permeability of Incoloy 800H and Inconel 617 deviated substantially from the values measured for hydrogen. This may be due to instrument offset, system absorption, presence of competing quantities of hydrogen, surface oxides, or other phenomena. Due to the challenge of determining the chemical composition of a mixture with such a low hydrogen isotope concentration, no categorical explanation of this offset has been developed.