Developing a Cost Model and Methodology to Estimate Capital Costs for Thermal Energy Storage

Glatzmaier, G.

关键词: CAPITALIZED COST;    CARBON DIOXIDE;    CARNOT CYCLE;    COMBINED CYCLES;    DESIGN;    EFFICIENCY;    ELECTRICITY;    ENERGY STORAGE;    HEAT TRANSFER;    PERFORMANCE;    POWER GENERATION;    RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES;    SOLAR COLLECTORS;    SOLAR ENERGY;    STEAM;    STORAGE;    TARGETS;    THERMODYNAMICS;    WORKING FLUIDS COST MODEL;    ADVANCED POWER CYCLES;    THERMAL ENERGY STORAGE;    TES;    CONCENTRATING SOLAR POWER;    CSP;    WORKSHOP;    HEAT TRANSFER FLUID;    MOLTEN SALT;    Electricity;    Resources;    and Buildings Systems;   

DOI  :  10.2172/1031953
RP-ID  :  NREL/TP-5500-53066
PID  :  OSTI ID: 1031953
Others  :  TRN: US201202%%76

美国|英语

来源: SciTech Connect

【 摘 要 】

This report provides an update on the previous cost model for thermal energy storage (TES) systems. The update allows NREL to estimate the costs of such systems that are compatible with the higher operating temperatures associated with advanced power cycles. The goal of the Department of Energy (DOE) Solar Energy Technology Program is to develop solar technologies that can make a significant contribution to the United States domestic energy supply. The recent DOE SunShot Initiative sets a very aggressive cost goal to reach a Levelized Cost of Energy (LCOE) of 6 cents/kWh by 2020 with no incentives or credits for all solar-to-electricity technologies.1 As this goal is reached, the share of utility power generation that is provided by renewable energy sources is expected to increase dramatically. Because Concentrating Solar Power (CSP) is currently the only renewable technology that is capable of integrating cost-effective energy storage, it is positioned to play a key role in providing renewable, dispatchable power to utilities as the share of power generation from renewable sources increases. Because of this role, future CSP plants will likely have as much as 15 hours of Thermal Energy Storage (TES) included in their design and operation. As such, the cost and performance of the TES system is critical to meeting the SunShot goal for solar technologies. The cost of electricity from a CSP plant depends strongly on its overall efficiency, which is a product of two components - the collection and conversion efficiencies. The collection efficiency determines the portion of incident solar energy that is captured as high-temperature thermal energy. The conversion efficiency determines the portion of thermal energy that is converted to electricity. The operating temperature at which the overall efficiency reaches its maximum depends on many factors, including material properties of the CSP plant components. Increasing the operating temperature of the power generation system leads to higher thermal-to-electric conversion efficiency. However, in a CSP system, higher operating temperature also leads to greater thermal losses. These two effects combine to give an optimal system-level operating temperature that may be less than the upper operating temperature limit of system components. The overall efficiency may be improved by developing materials, power cycles, and system-integration strategies that enable operation at elevated temperature while limiting thermal losses. This is particularly true for the TES system and its components. Meeting the SunShot cost target will require cost and performance improvements in all systems and components within a CSP plant. Solar collector field hardware will need to decrease significantly in cost with no loss in performance and possibly with performance improvements. As higher temperatures are considered for the power block, new working fluids, heat-transfer fluids (HTFs), and storage fluids will all need to be identified to meet these new operating conditions. Figure 1 shows thermodynamic conversion efficiency as a function of temperature for the ideal Carnot cycle and 75% Carnot, which is considered to be the practical efficiency attainable by current power cycles. Current conversion efficiencies for the parabolic trough steam cycle, power tower steam cycle, parabolic dish/Stirling, Ericsson, and air-Brayton/steam Rankine combined cycles are shown at their corresponding operating temperatures. Efficiencies for supercritical steam and carbon dioxide (CO{sub 2}) are also shown for their operating temperature ranges.