科技报告详细信息
Improving Building Energy Simulation Programs Through Diagnostic Testing (Fact Sheet)
关键词: ACCURACY;    AUDITS;    CALIBRATION;    EFFICIENCY;    ENERGY ANALYSIS;    ENERGY AUDITS;    MARKET;    OCCUPANTS;    PHYSICS;    RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS;    SIMULATION;    TESTING NREL HIGHLIGHT;    BUILDINGS;    RETROFIT;    ENERGY ANALYSIS;    BESTEST-EX;    Electricity;    Resources;    and Buildings Systems;    Buildings;   
DOI  :  10.2172/1036366
RP-ID  :  NREL/FS-5500-54093
PID  :  OSTI ID: 1036366
Others  :  TRN: US201206%%388
学科分类:能源(综合)
美国|英语
来源: SciTech Connect
PDF
【 摘 要 】

New test procedure evaluates quality and accuracy of energy analysis tools for the residential building retrofit market. Reducing the energy use of existing homes in the United States offers significant energy-saving opportunities, which can be identified through building simulation software tools that calculate optimal packages of efficiency measures. To improve the accuracy of energy analysis for residential buildings, the National Renewable Energy Laboratory's (NREL) Buildings Research team developed the Building Energy Simulation Test for Existing Homes (BESTEST-EX), a method for diagnosing and correcting errors in building energy audit software and calibration procedures. BESTEST-EX consists of building physics and utility bill calibration test cases, which software developers can use to compare their tools simulation findings to reference results generated with state-of-the-art simulation tools. Overall, the BESTEST-EX methodology: (1) Tests software predictions of retrofit energy savings in existing homes; (2) Ensures building physics calculations and utility bill calibration procedures perform to a minimum standard; and (3) Quantifies impacts of uncertainties in input audit data and occupant behavior. BESTEST-EX is helping software developers identify and correct bugs in their software, as well as develop and test utility bill calibration procedures.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO201704190004203LZ 447KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:12次 浏览次数:61次