Integrated Data Collection Analysis (IDCA) Program ??? IDCA Quarterly Program Review, September 14 and 15, 2010

Sandstrom, Mary M.¹  Brown, Geoffrey W.¹  Warner, Kirstin F.²  Remmers, Daniel L.²  Shelley, Timothy J.³  Reyes, Jose A.⁴  Hsu, Peter C.⁵  Reynolds, John G.⁵ 

[1] Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States);Naval Surface Warfare Center (IHD-NSWC), Indian Head, MD (United States). Indian Head Division;Air Force Research Lab. (AFRL/RXQF), Tyndall AFB, FL (United States);Applied Research Associates, Inc., Tyndall AFB, FL (United States);Lawrence Livermore National Lab. (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)

关键词: small-scale safety testing;    proficiency test;    round-robin test;    safety testing protocols;    program review;   

DOI  :  10.2172/1305815
RP-ID  :  LLNL-TR--527491
PID  :  OSTI ID: 1305815

学科分类：化学（综合）

美国|英语

来源: SciTech Connect

【 摘 要 】

The IDCA conducted a program review at Los Alamos National Laboratory, September 14 and 15, 2010. The review was divided into three parts: 1) an update on the current status of the program, 2) an information exchange and discussion on technical details for current issues and future planning, and 3) a tour of the SSST testing facilities at LANL. The meeting started with an update from DHS by Laura Parker and a restating of some of the objectives of the Proficiency Test of which the IDCA is currently engaged. This update was followed by a discussion of some high level programmatic issues particularly about ways of communicating the overall goals of the IDCA to non-technical representatives. The final topic focused on the difficulty of releasing information, including the DHS approval process, ITAR, and open publication. Next JGR presented a technical summary of accomplishments, schedule, milestones, and future directions. These key points made were: 1) about 1/3 of the materials have been tested, 2) some participants are behind others causing a lag in report writing, 3) method reports have been assigned to various participants to speed up the process of reporting, 4) the SSST Compendium needs reformatting and restructuring, and 5) the Compendium needs a web site to house with access control. After the technical update, some of the Proficiency Test results were shown comparing data from the various laboratories. These results included comparisons of the RDX standard, KC/sugar mixtures (-100 mesh and as received), KC/dodecane, KP/Al, and KP/C. Impact, friction, ESD, and DSC results were the focus. All the participants were involved in these discussions. This report includes summary notes, presentations, and explanatory information.