ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS FOR SELECTING ET #3 SITE

Collard, L. ; Hamm, L.

关键词: CAPACITY;    EXCAVATION;    INVENTORIES;    ISOTOPES;    MIXTURES;    PERFORMANCE;    SHIP PROPULSION REACTORS;    SIMULATION;    SOILS;    SOLID WASTES;    STORAGE;    WASTES;   

DOI  :  10.2172/1035510
RP-ID  :  SRNL-STI-2012-00047
PID  :  OSTI ID: 1035510
Others  :  TRN: US1201234

美国|英语

来源: SciTech Connect

【 摘 要 】

Engineered trenches (ETs) are considered to be a cost-effective method for disposing Low Level Waste (LLW). Based on waste forecasts from waste generators, the last engineered trench in operation (ET No.2) is anticipated to close in FY14, requiring development of a new ET. Solid Waste requested that SRNL develop an assessment report that reviews four disposal options for this new ET (ET No.3) and determine which option would provide the 'best' Performance Assessment (PA) disposal limits for LLW (Appendix A). Those four options (see option footprint locations in Figure 1-1) are: (1) Disposal at grade on TRU Pads 7-13 where soil would be mounded over waste packages; (2) Excavation at a slightly modified SLIT No.13 location - near the Used Equipment Storage Area; (3) Excavation at a modified SLIT No.12 location - near the 643-26E Naval Reactor Component Disposal Area; and (4) Excavation east of TRU Pad No.26 that replaces northeast portions of four slit trench (ST) disposal units in the eastern set of STs. The assessment consisted of both quantitative and qualitative analyses. The quantitative analysis captured key aspects that were readily quantifiable and had predictable impacts on limits and doses. A simplified modeling strategy stemming from current Special Analysis (SA) practices was employed. Both inventory capacity for a specific nuclide (a quasi-inventory limit) and overall performance for specified inventory mixtures (doses resulting from historical inventories) were considered. The qualitative analysis evaluated other key aspects based on engineering judgment in the form of pros and cons.