Modeling the Gila-San Francisco Basin using system dynamics in support of the 2004 Arizona Water Settlement Act.

Tidwell, Vincent Carroll ; Sun, Amy Cha-Tien ; Peplinski, William J. ; Klise, Geoffrey Taylor

关键词: AVAILABILITY;    MANAGEMENT;    RIVERS;    SANDIA NATIONAL LABORATORIES;    SENSITIVITY;    SIMULATION;    SURFACE WATERS;    WATER;    WATER RESOURCES;    WATER RIGHTS;    WATER SUPPLY;   

DOI  :  10.2172/1044988
RP-ID  :  SAND2012-3220
PID  :  OSTI ID: 1044988
Others  :  TRN: US201214%%1062

美国|英语

来源: SciTech Connect

【 摘 要 】

Water resource management requires collaborative solutions that cross institutional and political boundaries. This work describes the development and use of a computer-based tool for assessing the impact of additional water allocation from the Gila River and the San Francisco River prescribed in the 2004 Arizona Water Settlements Act. Between 2005 and 2010, Sandia National Laboratories engaged concerned citizens, local water stakeholders, and key federal and state agencies to collaboratively create the Gila-San Francisco Decision Support Tool. Based on principles of system dynamics, the tool is founded on a hydrologic balance of surface water, groundwater, and their associated coupling between water resources and demands. The tool is fitted with a user interface to facilitate sensitivity studies of various water supply and demand scenarios. The model also projects the consumptive use of water in the region as well as the potential CUFA (Consumptive Use and Forbearance Agreement which stipulates when and where Arizona Water Settlements Act diversions can be made) diversion over a 26-year horizon. Scenarios are selected to enhance our understanding of the potential human impacts on the rivers ecological health in New Mexico; in particular, different case studies thematic to water conservation, water rights, and minimum flow are tested using the model. The impact on potential CUFA diversions, agricultural consumptive use, and surface water availability are assessed relative to the changes imposed in the scenarios. While it has been difficult to gage the acceptance level from the stakeholders, the technical information that the model provides are valuable for facilitating dialogues in the context of the new settlement.