Status and Opportunities for Improving the Consistency of Technical Reference Manuals

Jayaweera, Tina¹  Velonis, Aquila¹  Haeri, Hossein¹  Goldman, Charles A.²  Schiller, Steven R.³ 

[1] The Cadmus Group, Walthum, MA (United States);Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States);Schiller Consulting, Inc., Piedmont, CA (United States)

关键词: TRM (Technical Reference Manual);    Energy Efficiency;    database;    Evaluation Measurement and Verification;    deemed savings;    EM&V;   

DOI  :  10.2172/1213542
RP-ID  :  LBNL--5540E
PID  :  OSTI ID: 1213542

学科分类：能源（综合）

美国|英语

来源: SciTech Connect

【 摘 要 】

Across the United States, energy-efficiency program administrators rely on Technical Reference Manuals (TRMs) as sources for calculations and deemed savings values for specific, well-defined efficiency measures. TRMs play an important part in energy efficiency program planning by providing a common and consistent source for calculation of ex ante and often ex post savings. They thus help reduce energy-efficiency resource acquisition costs by obviating the need for extensive measurement and verification and lower performance risk for program administrators and implementation contractors. This paper considers the benefits of establishing region-wide or national TRMs and considers the challenges of such undertaking due to the difficulties in comparing energy savings across jurisdictions. We argue that greater consistency across TRMs in the approaches used to determine deemed savings values, with more transparency about assumptions, would allow better comparisons in savings estimates across jurisdictions as well as improve confidence in reported efficiency measure savings. To support this thesis, we review approaches for the calculation of savings for select measures in TRMs currently in use in 17 jurisdictions. The review reveals differences in the saving methodologies, technical assumptions, and input variables used for estimating deemed savings values. These differences are described and their implications are summarized, using four, common energy-efficiency measures as examples. Recommendations are then offered for establishing a uniform approach for determining deemed savings values.