Stockbridge Munsee Community Health and Wellness Center and the Mohican Family Center Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Feasibility Study

DeRocher, Andy¹  Barrnett, Michael¹ 

[1] Stockbridge-Munsee Health and Wellness Center, Bowler, WI (United States)

关键词: alternative energy;    energy efficiency;    Tribe;    Stockbridge Munsee Community;   

DOI  :  10.2172/1176954
RP-ID  :  EE0005631--000
PID  :  OSTI ID: 1176954

美国|英语

来源: SciTech Connect

【 摘 要 】

The results of the Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Feasibility Study of Stockbridge Munsee Community???s Health and Wellness Center (HWC) indicate that a variety of renewable energy options and energy conservation measures (ECMs) exist for the facility. A requirement of the Request for Proposal for this study was to assess renewable energy options that could offset 30 to 100 percent of the HWC???s energy use. This study identifies that a geothermal system is the most cost effective renewable energy option available to decrease the HWC???s energy consumption by 30 to 100 percent. Currently the HWC performs in the lowest 8 percent of buildings in its building category, as scored in the EPA portfolio manager benchmarking tool. Multiple ECM opportunities have been identified with paybacks of less than five years to yield an estimated 25-percent decrease in annual energyconsumption. The ECMs within this payback period are estimated to save $26,800 per year with an implementation cost of just $4,650 (0.2 year payback). For the Mohican Family Center document: The results of the Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Feasibility Study of Stockbridge Munsee Community???s Mohican Family Center (MFC) indicate that a variety of renewable energy options and energy conservation measures (ECMs) exist for the facility. A requirement of the Request for Proposal for this study was to assess renewable energy options that could offset 30 to 100 percent of the MFC???s energy use. This study identifies that a geothermal system is the most cost effective renewable energy option available to decrease the MFC???s energy consumption by 30 to 100 percent. Currently the MFC performs better than 80 percent of buildings in its building category, as scored in the EPA portfolio manager benchmarking tool. Multiple ECM opportunities have been identified with short term paybacks to yield an estimated 13-percent decrease in energy consumption. The ECMs within this payback period are estimated to save $3,100 per year with an implementation cost of under $20,000.