科技报告详细信息
Gearbox Reliability Collaborative Phase 3 Gearbox 2 Test Report
Keller, Jonathan1  Wallen, Robb1 
[1] National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)
关键词: Gearbox Reliability Collaborative;    GRC;    gearbox;    reliability;    testing;    modeling;    analysis;    NREL;   
DOI  :  10.2172/1215122
RP-ID  :  NREL/TP--5000-63693
PID  :  OSTI ID: 1215122
学科分类:再生能源与代替技术
美国|英语
来源: SciTech Connect
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Many gearboxes in wind turbines have not been achieving their expected design life [1]; they do, however, commonly meet or exceed the design criteria specified in current standards in the gear, bearing, and wind turbine industry as well as third-party certification criteria. The cost of gearbox replacements and rebuilds, as well as the downtime associated with these failures, has elevated the cost of wind energy. In 2006, the U.S. Department of Energy established the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) Gearbox Reliability Collaborative (GRC). Its key goal is to understand the root causes of premature gearbox failures and improve their reliability [2]. The GRC is examining a hypothesis that the gap between design-estimated and actual wind turbine gearbox reliability is caused by underestimation of loads, inaccurate design tools, the absence of critical elements in the design process, or insufficient testing. This test report describes the recent tests of GRC gearbox (GB) 2 in the National Wind Technology Center (NWTC) dynamometer and documents any modifications to the original test plan [3]. In this manner, it serves as a guide for interpreting the publicly released data sets with brief analyses to illustrate the data. Specific objectives of the test were to assess the effect of dynamic nontorque load (NTL) on the planetary section, generator misalignment on the highspeed shaft (HSS), and field representative conditions on the gearbox in general. Detailed analysis of those test objectives will be presented in subsequent publications.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
5486KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:42次 浏览次数:38次