Control Strategies to Reduce the Energy Consumption of Central Domestic Hot Water Systems

Dentz, Jordan¹  Ansanelli, Eric¹  Henderson, Hugh¹  Varshney, Kapil¹ 

[1] The Levy Partnership, Inc., New York, NY (United States). Advanced Residential Integrated Energy Solutions

关键词: residential;    Residential Buildings;    ARIES;    Building America;    DHW;    domestic hot water;    multifamily;    recirculating pump controls;    demand control;    temperature modulation;    central domestic hot water systems;   

DOI  :  10.2172/1263778
RP-ID  :  DOE/GO--102016-4703
PID  :  OSTI ID: 1263778
Others  :  Other: 7429

学科分类：能源（综合）

美国|英语

来源: SciTech Connect

【 摘 要 】

Domestic hot water (DHW) heating is the second largest energy end use in U.S. buildings, exceeded only by space conditioning. Recirculation systems consisting of a pump and piping loop(s) are commonly used in multifamily buildings to reduce wait time for hot water at faucets; however, constant pumping increases energy consumption by exposing supply and return line piping to continuous heat loss, even during periods when there is no demand for hot water. In this study, ARIES installed and tested two types of recirculation controls in a pair of buildings in order to evaluate their energy savings potential. Demand control, temperature modulation controls, and the simultaneous operation of both were compared to the baseline case of constant recirculation. Additionally, interactive effects between DHW control fuel reductions and space conditioning (heating and cooling) were estimated in order to make more realistic predictions of the payback and financial viability of retrofitting DHW systems with these controls. Results showed that DHW fuel consumption reduced by 7% after implementing the demand control technique, 2% after implementing temperature modulation, and 15% after implementing demand control and temperature modulation techniques simultaneously; recirculation pump runtime was reduced to 14 minutes or less per day. With space heating and cooling interactions included, the estimated annual cost savings were 8%, 1%, and 14% for the respective control techniques. Possible complications in the installation, commissioning and operation of the controls were identified and solutions offered.