期刊论文详细信息
Microbiology Spectrum 卷:13
Rifaximin reduces gut-derived inflammation in severe acute pancreatitis: an experimental animal model and randomized controlled trial
Research Article
Yao-yu Zou1  Bing-jun Yu1  Cong He1  Ling Ding1  Xin Xu1  Jian-hua Wan1  Yu-peng Lei1  Xin Huang1  Hui-fang Xiong1  Wen-hua He1  Ling-yu Luo1  Liang Xia1  Nong-hua Lv1  Yin Zhu1 
[1] Department of Gastroenterology, Jiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Digestive Diseases, Jiangxi Clinical Research Center for Gastroenterology, Digestive Disease Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
关键词: acute pancreatitis;    rifaximin;    gut microbiota;    systemic inflammatory response syndrome;   
DOI  :  10.1128/spectrum.01299-25
 received in 2025-04-25, accepted in 2025-08-13,  发布年份 2025
来源: American Society for Microbiology
PDF
【 摘 要 】

ABSTRACTSevere acute pancreatitis (SAP) is characterized by systemic inflammation and intestinal barrier dysfunction and is often associated with gut microbiota dysbiosis. Rifaximin, a gut-specific non-absorbable antibiotic, is known to modulate the gut microbiota. Here, we investigated rifaximin’s effects and mechanisms in SAP using murine models and a single-center, open-label, randomized controlled trial (Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR2100049794). In mice, rifaximin attenuated pancreatic injury and systemic inflammation and altered gut microbiota composition by decreasing mucin-degrading genera such as Akkermansia (P < 0.05). These protective effects persisted in antibiotic-treated and germ-free mice, suggesting mechanisms not solely dependent on gut microbiota modulation. In patients with predicted SAP (n  =  60), rifaximin significantly reduced systemic inflammation compared with controls. WBC decreased from a median of 11.50 × 10⁹/L (IQR 8.76–15.68) to 8.49 × 10⁹/L (6.93–10.20; P = 0.04) and TNF-α from 15.05 pg/mL (12.73–19.75) to 11.00 pg/mL (8.74–15.40; P = 0.009). However, the incidence of culture-confirmed infection did not differ between the rifaximin and control groups (13.3% vs. 13.3%; RR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.28–3.63). Adverse events were comparable between groups. Metagenomic analyses revealed suppression of mucin-degrading bacteria (e.g., Akkermansia, Bacteroides fragilis, and Hungatella hathewayi) (P < 0.05) and reductions in mucin-degrading carbohydrate-active enzymes, including sialidases and fucosidases. In conclusion, among patients with predicted SAP, rifaximin did not reduce culture-confirmed infectious complications within 90 days after randomization compared with standard care, despite significant improvements in systemic inflammatory markers and selected fecal microbiome features. Larger randomized controlled trials are warranted to validate these findings.IMPORTANCEAlthough rifaximin has been used to target gut-derived inflammation in other contexts, its role in SAP remains largely unexplored. In this study, rifaximin treatment was associated with reduced pancreatic injury and systemic inflammation in both murine models and patients with predicted SAP. Treatment also led to changes in gut microbial composition, notably a decrease in mucin-degrading taxa. Importantly, similar protective effects were also observed in antibiotic-treated and germ-free mice, indicating that rifaximin may act via microbiota-dependent and host-directed pathways. These findings offer novel insights into the gut-pancreas axis and suggest that rifaximin holds therapeutic potential by modulating gut microbial composition and host inflammatory responses in SAP.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
Copyright © 2025 Zou et al.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202609140004352ZK.pdf 3025KB PDF download
RO202609140000231ZK.pdf 698KB PDF download
Figure 4 62KB Image download
Figure 11 93KB Image download
Figure 12 132KB Image download
RO202609140000508ZK.pdf 5208KB PDF download
Figure 10 60KB Image download
FIGURE 4 156KB Image download
RO202609140000232ZK.pdf 821KB PDF download
RO202609140000246ZK.pdf 750KB PDF download
RO202609140000251ZK.pdf 710KB PDF download
RO202609140000253ZK.pdf 1098KB PDF download
【 图 表 】

FIGURE 4

Figure 10

Figure 12

Figure 11

Figure 4

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]
  • [2]
  • [3]
  • [4]
  • [5]
  • [6]
  • [7]
  • [8]
  • [9]
  • [10]
  • [11]
  • [12]
  • [13]
  • [14]
  • [15]
  • [16]
  • [17]
  • [18]
  • [19]
  • [20]
  • [21]
  • [22]
  • [23]
  • [24]
  • [25]
  • [26]
  • [27]
  • [28]
  • [29]
  • [30]
  • [31]
  • [32]
  • [33]
  • [34]
  • [35]
  • [36]
  • [37]
  • [38]
  • [39]
  • [40]
  • [41]
  • [42]
  • [43]
  • [44]
  • [45]
  • [46]
  • [47]
  • [48]
  • [49]
  • [50]
  • [51]
  • [52]
  • [53]
  • [54]
  • [55]
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:0次 浏览次数:0次