Validation of a wearable system for 3D ambulatory L5/S1 moment assessment during manual lifting using instrumented shoes and an inertial sensor suit

JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS

卷:102

Article; Proceedings Paper

Faber, G. S.^1,2  Kingma, I¹  Chang, C. C.³  Dennerlein, J. T.^2,4  van Dieen, J. H.¹ 

[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Fac Behav & Movement Sci, Dept Human Movement Sci, Amsterdam Movement Sci, Amsterdam, Netherlands

[2] Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Environm Hlth, Boston, MA USA

[3] Natl Tsing Hua Univ, Dept Ind Engn & Engn Management, Hsinchu, Taiwan

[4] Northeastern Univ, Dept Phys Therapy Movement & Rehabil Sci, Boston, MA 02115 USA

关键词: Wearable sensors;    Occupational biomechanics;    Ergonomics;    Inertial measurement unit (IMU);    Spine;   

DOI  :  10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.109671

来源: Elsevier

【 摘 要 】

This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of 3D L5/S1 moment estimates from an ambulatory measurement system consisting of a wearable inertial motion capture system (IMC) and instrumented force shoes (FSs), during manual lifting. Reference L5/S1 moments were calculated using an inverse dynamics bottom-up laboratory model ((bu)LAB(model)), based on data from a measurement system comprising optical motion capture (OMC) and force plates (FPs). System performance of (1) a bottom-up ambulatory model ((bu)AMB(model)) using lower-body kinematic IMC and FS data, and (2) a top-down ambulatory model ((td)AMB(model)) using upper-body kinematic IMC data and hand forces (HFs) were compared. HFs were estimated using full-body kinematic IMC data and FS forces. Eight males and eight females lifted a 10-kg box from different initial vertical/horizontal positions using either a free or an asymmetric lifting style. As a measure of system performance, root-mean-square (RMS) errors were calculated between the reference ((bu)LAB(model)) and ambulatory ((td)AMB(model) & (bu)AMB(model)) moments. The results showed two times smaller errors for the (td)AMB(model) (averaged RMS errors < 20 Nm or 10% of peak extension moment) than for the (bu)AMB(model) (average RMS errors < 40 Nm or 20% of peak extension moment). In conclusion, for ambulatory L5/S1 moment assessment with an IMC + FS system, using a top-down inverse dynamics approach with estimated hand forces is to be preferred over a bottom-up approach. (C) 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

【 授权许可】

Free