Assessing kinematics and kinetics of functional electrical stimulation rowing

JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS

卷:53

Article

Draghici, Adina E.¹  Picard, Glen³  Taylor, J. Andrew^3,4  Shefelbine, Sandra J.^1,2 

[1] Northeastern Univ, Dept Bioengn, 360 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02115 USA

[2] Northeastern Univ, Dept Mech & Ind Engn, Boston, MA 02115 USA

[3] Spaulding Rehabil Hosp, Cardiovasc Res Lab, Cambridge, MA USA

[4] Harvard Med Sch, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Boston, MA USA

关键词: FES-rowing;    Kinematics;    Kinetics;    Mechanical efficiency;    Aerobic work;   

DOI  :  10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.01.007

来源: Elsevier

【 摘 要 】

Hybrid functional electrical stimulation (FES) rowing has positive effects on cardiovascular fitness, producing significantly greater aerobic power than either upper body or FES exercise alone. However, there is minimal information on the kinematics, kinetics, and mechanical efficiency of FES-rowing in the spinal cord injured (SCI) population. This study examined the biomechanics of FES-rowing to determine how motions, forces, and aerobic demand change with increasing intensity. Six individuals with SCI and six able-bodied subjects performed a progressive aerobic capacity rowing test. Differences in kinematics (motion profiles), kinetics (forces produced by the feet and arms), external mechanical work, and mechanical efficiency (work produced/volume of oxygen consumed) were compared in able-bodied rowing vs, SCI FES-rowing at three comparable subpeak workloads. With increasing exercise intensity (measured as wattage), able-bodied rowing increased stroke rate by decreasing recovery time, while FES-rowing maintained a constant stroke rate, with no change in drive or recovery times. While able-bodied rowers increased leg and arm forces with increasing intensity, FES-rowers used only their arms to achieve a higher intensity with a constant and relatively low contribution of the legs. Oxygen consumption increased in both groups, but more so in able-bodied rowers, resulting in able-bodied rowers having twice the mechanical efficiency of FES-rowers. Our results suggest that despite its ability to allow for whole body exercise, the total force output achievable with FES-rowing results in only modest loading of the legs that affects overall rowing performance and that may limit forces applied to bone. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

【 授权许可】

Free