期刊论文详细信息
JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS 卷:188
Interpretation of ambiguity: Differences between children and adolescents with and without an anxiety disorder
Article
Waite, Polly1  Codd, Jon2  Creswell, Cathy1 
[1] Univ Reading, Sch Psychol & Clin Language Sci, Reading RG6 6AL, Berks, England
[2] Shinfield Med Practice, Talking Therapies, Reading, Berks, England
关键词: Anxiety/anxiety disorders;    Child/adolescent;    Cognition;   
DOI  :  10.1016/j.jad.2015.08.022
来源: Elsevier
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background: Theory and treatment of anxiety disorders in young people are commonly based on the premise that interpretation biases found in anxious adults are also found in children and adolescents. Although there is some evidence that this may be the case, studies have not typically taken age into account, which is surprising given the normative changes in cognition that occur throughout childhood. The aim of the current study was to identify whether associations between anxiety disorder status and interpretation biases differed in children and adolescents. Methods: The responses of children (7-10 years) and adolescents (13-16 years) with and without anxiety disorders (n =120) were compared on an ambiguous scenarios task. Results.: Children and adolescents with an anxiety disorder showed significantly higher levels of threat interpretation and avoidant strategies than non-anxious children and adolescents. However, age significantly moderated the effect of anxiety disorder status on interpretation of ambiguity, in that adolescents with anxiety disorders showed significantly higher levels of threat interpretation and associated negative emotion than non-anxious adolescents, but a similar relationship was not observed among children. Conclusions: The findings suggest that theoretical accounts of interpretation biases in anxiety disorders in children and adolescents should distinguish between different developmental periods. For both ages, treatment that targets behavioral avoidance appears warranted. However, while adolescents are likely to benefit from treatment that addresses interpretation biases, there may be limited benefit for children under the age of ten. (c) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

【 授权许可】

Free   

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
10_1016_j_jad_2015_08_022.pdf 494KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:1次 浏览次数:0次