Coronary Artery Calcium Improves Risk Classification in Younger Populations

JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING

卷:8

Article

Paixao, Andre R. M.^1,2  Ayers, Colby R.^1,2,3  El Sabbagh, Abdallah¹  Sanghavi, Monika^1,2  Berry, Jarett D.^1,2,3  Rohatgi, Anand^1,2  Kumbhani, Dharam J.^1,2  McGuire, Darrell K.^1,2  Das, Sandeep R.^1,2  de Lemos, James A.^1,2  Khera, Amit^1,2 

[1] Univ Texas SW Med Ctr Dallas, Dept Internal Med, Dallas, TX 75390 USA

[2] Univ Texas SW Med Ctr Dallas, Div Cardiol, Dallas, TX 75390 USA

[3] Univ Texas SW Med Ctr Dallas, Dept Clin Sci, Dallas, TX 75390 USA

关键词: calcium score;    coronary heart disease;    net reclassification;    risk prediction;    risk stratification;   

DOI  :  10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.06.015

来源: Elsevier

【 摘 要 】

OBJECTIVES This study sought to assess the effect of coronary artery calcium (CAC) on coronary heart disease (CHD) risk prediction in a younger population. BACKGROUND CAC measured by computed tomography improves CHD risk classification in older adults, but the effectiveness of CAC in younger populations has not been fully assessed. METHODS In the DHS (Dallas Heart Study), a multiethnic probability-based population sample, traditional CHD risk factors and CAC were measured in participants without baseline cardiovascular disease or diabetes. Incident CHD defined as CHD death, myocardial infarction, or coronary revascularization was assessed over a median follow-up of 9.2 years. Predicted CHD risk was assessed with a Weibull model inclusive of traditional risk factors before and after the addition of CAC as ln(CAC + 1). Participants were divided into 3 10-year risk categories, <6%, 6% to <20%, and >= 2.20%, and the net reclassification improvement (NRI) was calculated. We also performed a random-effects meta-analysis of NRI from previous studies inclusive of older individuals. RESULTS The analysis comprised 2,084 participants; mean age was 44.4 +/- 9.0 years. CAC was independently associated with incident CHD (hazard ratio per SD: 1.90, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.51 to 2.38; p < 0.001). The addition of CAC to the traditional risk factor model resulted in significant improvement in the C-statistic (delta = 0.03; p = 0.003). Among participants with CHD events, the addition of CAC resulted in net correct upward reclassification of 21%, and among those without CHD, a net correct downward reclassification of 0.5% (NRI: 0.216, p = 0.012). Results remained significant when the outcome was restricted to CHD death and myocardial infarction and when individuals with diabetes were included. The NRI observed in this study was similar to the pooled estimate from previous studies (0.200, 95% CI: 0.140 to 0.258) and the addition of our study to the meta-analysis did not result in significant heterogeneity (I-2 = 0%). CONCLUSIONS CAC scoring also improves CHD risk classification in younger adults. (C) 2015 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

【 授权许可】

Free