| INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY | 卷:7 |
| Meta-analysis: A practical decision making tool for surgeons | |
| Review | |
| Panesar, Sukhmeet S.2  Bhandari, Mohit3  Darzi, Ara1  Athanasiou, Thanos1  | |
| [1] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Div Surg Oncol Reprod Biol & Anaesthet, London W2 1NY, England | |
| [2] NPSA, London W1T 5HD, England | |
| [3] McMaster Univ, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada | |
| 关键词: Evidence; Meta-analysis; Systematic review; Surgery; | |
| DOI : 10.1016/j.ijsu.2009.05.004 | |
| 来源: Elsevier | |
PDF
|
|
【 摘 要 】
Background: The exponential rise in published medical research on a yearly basis demands a method to summarise best evidence towards its application to patient care in clinical practice. A robust meta-analysis is a valid tool. It is often considered to be a simple process of pooling results from different studies. This is not true. It appears that surgeons lack a reference guide to help them conduct and appraise a meta-analysis. Methods: This paper provides a structural framework to perform a meta-analysis. It guides the surgeon on a journey from identification of the correct clinical question to data analysis and through to producing a structured report. Statistical methods are discussed briefly as most commercial software calculates most results in the background. An example of a recent meta-analysis is given. However, important caveats are mentioned as there are limitations of the meta-analytical technique. Conclusion: Whereas meta-analyses of homogeneous studies are the highest form of evidence, poorly conducted meta-analyses create confusion and serve to harm the patient. Surgeons practising their art in an era of evidence-based surgery need to understand the principles of meta-analyses. (C) 2009 Surgical Associates Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
【 授权许可】
Free
【 预 览 】
| Files | Size | Format | View |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10_1016_j_ijsu_2009_05_004.pdf | 469KB |
PDF