Pancreaticogastrostomy has advantages over pancreaticojejunostomy on pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY

卷:36

Review

Qin, Han¹  Luo, Lin¹  Zhu, Zexin¹  Huang, Jiwei¹ 

[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Dept Hepat Surg, Guoxue Xiang 37, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China

关键词: Pancreaticogastrostomy;    Pancreaticojejunostomy;    Pancreaticoduodenectomy;   

DOI  :  10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.10.020

来源: Elsevier

【 摘 要 】

Objective: To examine whether pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) or pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) is the better reconstructive method to reduce postoperative complications, especially pancreatic fistula (PF), after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Background: PF is a severe complication after PD. The best reconstructive method to reduce occurrence of PF is controversial. We carried out this meta-analysis to compare PG with PJ. Methods: A systematic review was conducted on PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library published up to October 2015 to identify studies comparing PG with PJ. Postoperative complications and mortality were evaluated. A meta-analysis was carried out by Review Manager 5.0. Results: 10 RCTs representing 1629 patients (826 PG, 803 PJ) were included. There was a significant difference in favor of PG over PJ (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.56-0.92, P = 0.009, I-2 = 10%). No significant differences were found in biliary fistula (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.31-1.06, P = 0.08, I-2 = 38%), DGE (OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.68-1.70, P = 0.75, I-2 = 53%), overall morbidity (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.77-1.23, P = 0.82, I-2 = 28%), and mortality (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.60-1.61, P = 0.94, I-2 = 0%). Conclusions: The meta-analysis showed a significant difference between PG and PJ on PF: PG was associated with significantly less PF when compared to PJ, indicating that PG is superior to PJ for reconstruction after PD. (C) 2016 IJS Publishing Group Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

【 授权许可】

Free