Arsenic removal from iron-containing groundwater by delayed aeration in dual-media sand filters

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS

卷:411

Article

Annaduzzaman, Md¹  Rietveld, Luuk C.¹  Hoque, Bilqis Amin²  Bari, Md Niamul³  van Halem, Doris¹ 

[1] Delft Univ Technol, Sanit Engn Sect, Dept Water Management, Delft, Netherlands

[2] Environm & Populat Res Ctr, Dhaka, Bangladesh

[3] Rajshahi Univ Engn & Technol, Dept Civil Engn, Rajshahi, Bangladesh

关键词: Anoxic storage;    Arsenic removal;    Sand filtration;    Drinking water treatment;   

DOI  :  10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124823

来源: Elsevier

【 摘 要 】

Generally, abstracted groundwater is aerated, leading to iron (Fe2+) oxidation to Fe3+ and precipitation as Fe3+-(hydr)oxide (HFO) flocs. This practice of passive groundwater treatment, however, is not considered a barrier for arsenic (As), as removal efficiencies vary widely (15-95%), depending on Fe/As ratio. This study hypothesizes that full utilization of the adsorption capacity of groundwater native-Fe2+ based HFO flocs is hampered by rapid Fe2+ oxidation-precipitation during aeration before or after storage. Therefore, delaying Fe2+ oxidation by the introduction of an anoxic storage step before aeration-filtration was investigated for As(III) oxidation and removal in Rajshahi (Bangladesh) with natural groundwater containing 329(+/- 0.05) mu gAs/L. The results indicated that As(III) oxidation in the oxic storage was higher with complete and rapid Fe2+ oxidation (2 +/- 0.01 mg/L) than in the anoxic storage system, where Fe2+ oxidation was partial (1.03 +/- 0.32 mg/L), but the oxidized As (V)/Fe removal ratio was comparatively higher for the anoxic storage system. The low pH (6.9) and dissolved oxygen (DO) concentration (0.24 mg/L) in the anoxic storage limited the rapid oxidation of Fe2+ and facilitated more As(V) removal. The groundwater native-Fe2+ (2.33 +/- 0.03 mg/L) removed 61% of As in the oxic system (storage-aeration-filtration), whereas 92% As removal was achieved in the anoxic system.

【 授权许可】

Free